Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sh. Hrushrxesh Vs Asian Radhika Multiplex (Competition Commission of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sh Hrushrxesh Vs Asian Radhika Multiplex (Competition Commission of India)

Based on the data submitted, the DGAP found that the respondent had maintained the cum-tax price of movie tickets at Rs. 130 even after the GST rate reduction. Detailed computations revealed a profiteering amount of Rs. 88,67,790 during the period from January 2019 to April 2020. The investigation assessed compliance with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, which mandates the passing on of GST rate reduction benefits to consumers. It concluded that the respondent had contravened this provision.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31