GCO Technologies Centre Private Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) We have deliberated at length on the aforesaid issue under consideration and are unable to persuade ourselves to subscribe to the projection of the aforesaid comparable company viz. M/s Cather Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd by the assessee as a profit making company during the financial year […]
Dream Motels (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether treating municipal taxes paid is considered as a part of rent liable to be taxed u/s 23 of the act? ITAT states that, upon due consideration of factual matrix, the crystal-clear position that emerges is the fact that as per the […]
The issue under consideration is whether DRP is correct in considering the Liaison Office (LO) and Land Earth Station (‘LES’) constitutes a permanent establishment (PE) in India?
The issue under consideration is whether disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) made by AO forming an opinion that interest bearing funds were withdrawn from the firm being capital withdrawn by the partners and interest free advances is justified in law?
Jalarani Jagruti Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) It is not in dispute that receipts in question have direct nexus with the business of the assessee and represent cash receipts against sale of shops and flats. is also not in dispute that the assessee follows project completion method of revenue recognition and that project […]
ITO Vs Newtech (India) Developers (ITAT Mumbai) What was to be received by the assessee was from a joint venture, in which assessee itself was a participant, but, under the said arrangement, it was to be entirely funded by Shivalik Ventures Pvt Ltd. The essence of the arrangement was the performance of obligations by the […]
DCIT Vs Edelweiss Tokio Life Insurance Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) During assessment proceedings, it transpired that the assessee earned dividend income of Rs.17.92 Lacs and claimed the same to be exempt u/s.10(34). However, the Ld. Assessing Officer opined that since the income in case of insurance business was to be computed in terms of provisions of […]
DCIT Vs Paresh K. Shah (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: Since the date of initiation of search u/s 132 for the purpose of an assessment u/s 153C had to be construed as the date of receiving the books of account by the AO having jurisdiction over such other person, from the A.O. of the searched person, the […]
The issue under consideration is whether AO is correct in making addition for royalty on account of alleged royalty taxable under section 9 (l)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Article 12(3) of India Switzerland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA)?
The issue under consideration is whether the disallowance u/s 69C of entire purchase amount by considering it as bogus is justified in law?
