TDS under section 194H was not required to be deducted on discount allowed to distributors on sale of Set Top Box and hardware, recharge coupons vouchers because transaction between assessee company and distributor was on principal-to-principal basis and all the risk, loss, damages were transferred to distributor on delivery and it was a sale but not service to come within the ambit of definition of commission as defined under section 194H.
Shri Badresh Mansukhlal Dodhia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Without evidence LTCG on sale of Shares through Recognized Stock Exchange cannot be treated as Accommodation Entries The main issue under consideration in this appeal is the claim of deduction u/s 10(38) of the Act, the relevant facts are, during the year assessee had earned LTCG of […]
Tata Sky Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) By virtue of this Miscellaneous Application, the assessee on a limited aspect seeks to recall the order of this Tribunal on one particular issue alone with regard to upholding the disallowance made u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act on year end provision for expenses on the ground that while rendering […]
Prism Cement Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) We observed that assessee has earned exempt income of Rs. 12,62,95,486/- and made a suo moto disallowance of Rs. 29,87,943/-. After careful consideration of the assessment order passed by the AO and the order passed by Ld. CIT(A), it is fact on record that AO has not recorded […]
Maker Tower Premises Co. Op. Society Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Rent is for space to host the antennas and not for the antennas. As long as the rent is for the space, terrace and roof space in this case and which space is certainly a part of the building, the rent can only be […]
In my considered opinion, disallowance of 12.5% of the bogus purchase as reduced by the gross profit already disclosed by the assessee would meet the end of justice. It does not need to be reiterated that if the gross profit already shown is more than 12.5%, no disallowance is required.
Dinesh Salecha Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) It was expounded that in case of assessments which have attained finality no addition under section 153A can be done without seized incrementing material. We are aware that in these cases earlier assessments were not done u/s 143(3). In our considered opinion, the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court has never […]
Kalpana Mukesh Ruia Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) As regards the issue of additions on merits for the bogus long-term capital gain (LTCG), we note that the same is based upon the modus operandi of earning bogus long-term capital gain in general mentioned by the assessing officer. It is further more based upon the statements obtained […]
NGC Network Asia LLC Vs DDIT- International Tax (ITAT Mumbai) One of The ground raised by the assessee is with regard to charging of interest u/s.234B of the Act. We find that assessee is a non-resident whose entire income is subject to deduction of tax at source u/s.195 of the Act. Accordingly, the assessee had […]
Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) IT held that At page 60-61 of its order dated 28th December, 2020, certain observations were made about Mr Cyrus Mistry. One fact, which was inadvertently missed out, was that the information furnished by Mr Mistry was in response to a notice. Under these circumstances, the observations […]
