Madras High Court sets aside property tax order citing violation of natural justice and non-compliance with Tamil Nadu Government Order on tax increase factors.
Subsequently, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the petitioner in Form DRC-01 on 31.10.2023. A personal hearing was offered on 15.11.2023. However, the petitioner had neither filed its reply nor availed the opportunity for a personal hearing.
Madras HC condones 78-day delay in GST appeal and directs the Appellate authority to decide on merits after considering petitioner’s circumstances.
Madras High Court held that ex-parte order passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act without affording adequate opportunity of being heard is in violation of principles of natural justice. Accordingly, order set aside.
Madras High Court held that proviso 3 to section 161 of the CGST Act provides that it is mandatory to grant an opportunity of being heard if rectification order is detrimental to the interest of assessee.
Madras HC quashes order for GST assessment, stating no opportunity was given to reply to Show Cause Notice, violating natural justice principles.
Madras HC denies GST ITC on gold coins and T-shirts used in sales promotions, citing Section 17(5)(h). Stock discrepancy claims also upheld for ARS Steels case.
Madras High Court ruled that Rule 86A of CGST Rules allows negative ITC blocking, irrespective of credit availability in ECL, to curb fraudulent input tax credit.
Section 179(1) of Income Tax Act is explicitly applicable only to private limited companies and does not extend to public companies. As there is no similar provision for public companies
Madras HC remits Shobikaa Impex’s IGST refund case for reassessment, emphasizing export incentives over procedural lapses. ₹22.5 Cr claim to be reviewed under Rule 89.
