Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suriya Cement Agency Vs State Tax Officer (ST) (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suriya Cement Agency Vs State Tax Officer (ST) (Madras High Court) Madras High Court held that proviso 3 to section 161 of the CGST Act provides that it is mandatory to grant an opportunity of being heard if rectification order is detrimental to the interest of assessee. Facts- The challenge in the Writ Petition is the Order of Assessment and also the order passed in the Rectification Application. Petitioner contended that the Rectification Application of the Order of Assessment dated 20.12.2023 was filed within the given time. However, the first respondent without assigning any reasons as to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930