In a suit for partition, the properties which had been given as dowry or otherwise at the time of marriage of the daughter plaintiff, claiming a right of partition under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, would be amenable for partition and the same would have to be included in a suit for partition.
Registration number of truck owner is not relevant for deciding applicability of Section 194C but it is personnel/truck operator from whom trucks are hired.
All India Gaming Federation Vs State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court) Held by High Court 1. The provisions of Sections 2, 3, 6, 8 & 9 of the Karnataka Police (Amendment) Act 2021 i.e., Karnataka Act No.28 of 2021 are declared to be ultra vires the Constitution of India in their entirety and accordingly are […]
HC held that the service provided by the petitioner i.e., leasing out residential premises as hostel to students and working professionals is covered under Entry 13 of Notification No.9/2017 dated 28.09.2017 namely ‘Services by way of renting of residential dwelling for use as residence’ issued under the Act. The petitioner is held entitled to benefit of exemption notification.
Karnataka HC: Ola Cabs face copyright infringement charges by Lahari Recording Company for displaying music videos in Ola Prime cabs. Legal analysis included.
Shekar B.S. Vs Chief General Manager, Syndicate Bank (Karnataka High Court) Bank’s justification is, petitioner has not opted for switchover to a new system. The fact remains that bank has reduced the rate of interest from 11.75% to 8.25% with effect from 24.01.2017. It is a housing loan. The stand taken by the bank that […]
Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court) The petitioner – assessee is a manufacturer and dealer of consumer goods under provisions of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (‘CST Act’ for short). The returns in Form VAT 100 were filed by the assessee […]
FCI OEN Connectors Limited Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court) The limited point that arises for consideration is, whether the respondents were justified in encashing the bank guarantee and invoking the continuity bonds before expiry of the statutory appeal period of 60 days from the date of the order dated 10.03.2021. As rightly contended […]
Where a response was sought by the Assessing Officer to the show cause notice, giving less than 24 hours, it has been held to be arbitrary resulting in palpable injustice. Thus, without going into merits or demerits of the case, it would be suffice in restoring the proceedins to the Assessing Officer to provide reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner with liberty to file additional reply, annulling the assessment order.
Governor, RBI Vs Velankani Information Systems Limited (Karnataka High Court) Briefly stated the facts of the case are that, respondent No.1 herein had availed the term loan facilities from respondent Nos.5 to 7. Respondent No.1 herein claiming to be the owner and operator of Five Star Hotel and Technology Park had approached the writ Court […]
