Karnataka High Court held the provisional attachment order unjustifiable as the same was passed simply stating that there is likely addition of the amount without mentioning of any valid and cogent reasons.
HC set aside the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner denying the interest to the assessee for delayed refund and granted relief under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CE Act) to pay the interest at the rate of 6% per annum for committing delay in issuing service tax refund order.
The burden lies on the Insurance Company to prove the same except relying upon the endorsement, nothing is placed on record and also the author of the document has not been examined.
ABB Global Industries Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka High court In case of ABB Global Industries and services Pvt Ltd, Quashed the order passed by the PO on reason of natural justice , as petitioner requested additional time for hearing , PO rejected and passed the order FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF […]
Sunita W/O Bharatkumar Aitawade Vs Vidya W/O Sagar Aitawade (Karnataka High Court) The cheque in question was issued on 01.08.2019. The petitioners, who were the Directors of the Company, ceased to be the Directors of the Company with effect from 22.03.2017 which is evident from the Form No.DIR-12 issued by Registrar of the Companies and the same […]
Mudit Saxena Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court) Banks Can Not Initiate Recovery of Loan From Homebuyers For Non-Payment of EMI Due to Default on the part of the Builder/Developer (Karnataka High Court): RERA In a significant order, Karnataka High Court prohibits Punjab National Bank Housing Finance Limited (PNBHFL) from using coercive means to […]
Karnataka High Court directed restoration of GST registration as non-payment of GST and non-filing of GST return, on account of bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause du;u accepted
Karnataka High Court held that the expenses incurred towards stamp duty in connection with issue for public subscription of shares or debentures of the company is an allowable expenditure under section 35D of the Income Tax Act.
Karnataka High Court held that contravention of provisions of section 269SS of the Act doesn’t make the entire transaction of loan void. Non-payment of the same held guilty of commission of offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
HC held that wife cannot be made accused for dishonor of the cheque issued by her husband and he alone can be prosecuted for the same.
