Pawan Mundra Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) The issue under consideration whether AO is justified levying penalty under section 271AAB on failure to offer explanation about the source of the undisclosed investment in land? ITAT states that during course of post search proceedings, assessee admitted an income of Rs. 6,00,000 on account of undisclosed investment in […]
Shankar Lal Kumawat Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Section 271F penalty valid for not filing Return if Total Income before section 54 exemption exceeds maximum amount not chargeable to income-tax Section 139(1)(b) provides that every person, being a person other than a company or a firm, if his total income or the total income of any […]
The issue under consideration is whether the expense on electricity and water bill will convert the status of plot of land into residential property and accordingly assessee will be eligible for deduction u/s 54?
Santosh Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Tribunal has considered the guidance note of ICAI in respect of the tax audit U/s 44AB of the Act wherein the turnover or gross receipt in respect of speculative transactions has been considered as some total of positive and negative outcome of the speculative transactions. This Tribunal in a […]
Government Secondary School Principal Officer Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) The issue under consideration is whether the late filing fees u/s 234E can be deleted if there is a ‘reasonable cause’ for such default? In the present case, the assessee is the Principal of Secondary School and responsible for deducting tax at source, depositing the same […]
The issue under consideration is whether the late filing fees for TDS return u/s 234E is mandatory in nature or it can be condone if there is reasonable cause?
whether the AO is correct in chargeing capital gain in the hands of assessee irrespective of the fact that the full consideration not received by the assessee?
whether CIT(A) is justified in quashing the action of the AO u/s 154 in applying provision of section 115BBE on undisclosed investment surrendered during the course of survey proceedings?
whether CIT(A) is justified in quashing the action of the AO u/s 154 of the Act in applying provision of section 115BBE of the IT Act on undisclosed investment surrendered during the course of survey proceedings?
The issue under consideration is whether the provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b) can be invoked in case of agricultural land where it doesn’t qualify as falling in the definition of capital asset?
