Explore the ITAT Chennai ruling in Col. D. Pradeep Kumar vs. DCIT regarding the disallowance of Service Tax under section 43B. ITAT directs the AO to verify and limit the disallowance
Explore the ITAT Chennai decision in Tristar Container Services case. Analysis of lease rental disallowance, treatment of containers as assets, and alternative depreciation claim.
G. V. N. Hospitals Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) In the present case, admittedly there is difference in net profit as shown in ITR and tax audit report and same has not been satisfactorily explained by the assessee. The Assessing Officer, after considering relevant facts has rightly made additions towards difference in net profit. The learned […]
ACIT Vs Muktha Shantiniketan Properties (ITAT Chennai) It is an undisputed fact that the assessee has raised objection for reopening of assessment and the Assessing Officer has not passed any speaking order in respect of the objections raised by the assessee. It is contrary to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case […]
Sasi Enterprises Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee received refund of Rs.3.70 Lacs from one Mrs. Nagammal. In support, the assessee produced confirmation letter given by Shri P.V.Padmanadhan (son of deceased Mrs. Nagammal). It was stated that Mrs. Nagammal entered into an agreement for sale of 25 acres of land and received advance of Rs. […]
Jaya Publications Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) We find that the assessee has purchased Computers for business purposes and claimed depreciation thereon. In support, the relevant invoices were produced. The only reason to disallow the depreciation is the conclusion of Ld. AO that the use of computers for business was not established. However, this conclusion is […]
ITAT Chennai allows deduction of interest expenses for abandoned project. Legal principles supported by judicial precedents. Assessment reopened validly
We noted that the turnover has increased more than double and consequently expenses have increased little more than doubt on both counts i.e., salary as well as EB charges. We noted that the AO has made estimated disallowance on the basis that the assessee has not furnished any separate documents like details of staff or details of electricity bills.
Sri Sivajothi Spinning Mills Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) ITAT heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The ld. CIT(A) (NFAC) has rejected the appeal filed by the assessee on the ground that the due date for filing the appeal was 30.03.2020 and […]
Assessee claimed that recipient has included the receipts in their return of income in regard to these expenses on which assessee has not deducted TDS
