Assessee being a real estate developer, allotted 10060 equity shares as per the fair market value (FMV) computed in accordance with Sec.56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11U / 11UA.
ITAT Chennai held that only profit embedded to creditors written off and discount receipts is needed to be added since both i.e. creditors written off and discount receipts are inextricably linked with business of assessee. Hence, appeal partly allowed.
ITAT Chennai held that cash collected from customers for purchase of stamp papers were deposited in bank hence source of cash deposits duly explained. Thus, addition towards unexplained cash deposits u/s. 69A of the Income Tax Act not justified.
ITAT Chennai held that estimation of 8% as income on the total receipt by AO is justifiable since assessee failed to substantiate its claim of earning 5% commission on total receipt. Accordingly, addition confirmed and appeal dismissed.
ITAT Chennai sets aside ex-parte CIT(A) order on ₹33 lakh cash deposit, citing natural justice and Section 250(6) violations. Case remanded for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Chennai set aside the order and appeal restored back to the file of AO for denovo assessment, however, cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed for non-response on the part of the assessee. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Chennai remands Rs.117.01 lakh addition for fresh review, citing non-consideration of assessee’s details in assessment.
ITAT reduces income estimation to 2% for ticket agent’s ₹118 Lakhs cash deposit case, providing relief by lowering the AO’s 10% margin estimation.
In the case abovementioned ITAT have held that there is no need to purchase residential property in own name by any assesseee for the purpose of claim of capital gain u/s 54F.
ITAT Chennai remands appeal of Selvalakshmi Feeds & Farms to CIT(A) for reassessment, citing lack of proper adjudication. Learn key details of this 2024 case.
