Income declared in survey is to be taxed and it has to fall under one of the heads of income, i.e., business income and, therefore, is available for set-off against the business loss.
DCIT Vs NLC India Ltd. (ITAT Chennai) The main objection of the AO is that the new unit started cannot be considered as separate undertaking because it is using the same manufacturing technology and the finished goods are also the same, i.e., power. The new unit, i.e., unit TPS-I Expansion is nothing but the expansion […]
FIH India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) There is no dispute with regard to the fact that the assessee has written off input Service Tax during the impugned financial year relevant to assessment year 2010-11. But, the dispute is with regard to deductibility of input service tax. The AO has disputed deduction claimed by […]
Sai Mirra Innopharm Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) On perusal of details filed by the assessee, we find that the assessee has entered into a contract manufacturing agreement with Dr.Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., for a period of 10 years for manufacturing of drugs as per the specification provided by the principals, but the know-how required […]
Dodla International Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) ITAT held that license fee received by the assessee for licensing a fully furnished hotel along with license to run the hotel is a business receipt, which is assessable under the head ‘income from business or profession’ but not a rental income, which is assessable under the head […]
Sakthi Textiles Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) Coming back to observations of the Assessing Officer regarding valuation report. The Assessing Officer never stated that assessee has not filed valuation report in support of fair market value of shares. In fact, Assessing Officer has categorically admitted that assessee has filed valuation report from independent Chartered Accountant […]
Explore Anjli Foundations’ eligibility for 80IB(10) deduction as ITAT Chennai reviews the case. Legal analysis, key points, and ITAT judgment insights provided.
ACIT Vs SV Global Mill Ltd. (ITAT Chennai) We find that the Tribunal in the context of Section 10(37) of IT Act, held that interest received for delayed payment of enhanced compensation in respect of acquisition of immovable property is in the nature of interest liable to be taxed u/s.56(2)(viii) r.w.s. 145A(b) of IT Act. […]
ITO Vs Anjli Foundations (ITAT Chennai) The undisputed fact in this case is that the assessee is owner of the land. Therefore, for claiming the deduction u/s. 80IB(10), the assessee has to establish that it had undertaken developmental activities which include activities like undertaking the levelling the road and removal of rock surface in the […]
Since there was no allegation by AO on failure on the part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment, therefore, reopening of assessment was not based on sound footing and hence the impugned assessment order framed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 was illegal and liable to be quashed.
