Jeyaraman Senthil Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT CHENNAI) On perusal of the appellate order, we find that the ld. CIT(A) has given several opportunities and the assessee could not appear before the ld. CIT(A) due to circumstances beyond his control being COVID-19 pandemic period. Hence, we are of the opinion that one more opportunity should be […]
Mohideen Sharif Inayathulla Sharif Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Ground- The Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-13, Chennai failed to independently apply his mind that the village in which this land is situated is more than 5 kilometers from the nearest municipal limits. A mere misstatement or confusion with regard to the identical name of 2 villages […]
Tractors and Farm Equipment Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) The submissions of Ld. AR are that warranty expenditure is part of overall sales obligations and the expenditure is reimbursed on actual basis. The warranty obligation being part and parcel of sales transactions and therefore, the same could not be held to be ‘fees for technical […]
Shanmugar Services Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) As per the provisions of Sec.194C of the Act, any person responsible for making payment for any services needs to deduct TDS on such payment at the prescribed rate. From the plain reading of Sec.194C of the Act, it is abundantly clear that the person who makes payment is […]
P. Divagar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) n the present case, the only issue for consideration is whether the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Act is valid or not. For the sake of convenience, the reasons recorded and communicated to the assessee are reproduced as under: “The assessee filed his return of income […]
Learned PCIT has exceeded her jurisdiction in examining issues other than the issues which is subject matter of limited scrutiny assessment proceedings before the Assessing Officer.
. Expenses such as reflooring, painting of walls, false ceiling, temporary wooden structures were incurred to produce the right ambience to attract customers
ACIT Vs Ankur Foundation P. Ltd (ITAT Chennai) The assessee claimed bad-debt of Rs.20 Lacs written-off against Mr. K.M.Pitchai. The same was held to be not allowable under any of the provisions. During appellate proceedings, it was explained that the assessee paid land advance of Rs.25 Lacs to Mr. Pitchaiin AY 2006-07. Since Mr. Pitchai […]
Dr. E.S. Krishnamoorthy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The facts with regard to ownership of property by three co-owners and their respective share in right and interest in the property is not in dispute. As admitted by the assessee himself, he owned 42.5% share in the property. The land owners have received two flats measuring 4092 […]
Kalaivani Spinners Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT observed that PCIT himself admits that there are different views possible on claim of deduction u/s.80IA and issue is highly debatable. Once the issue is highly debatable no revision is possible invoking the provisions of section 263 of the Act. Hence, we quash the revision order passed […]
