ITAT Chandigarh held that Ld. NFAC ignoring the submissions and the documents being sought to be filed as additional evidences and dismissal of assessees appeal without even commenting on the submissions or the documents is patently and legally wrong.
In present facts of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 3,31,000/- by the AO, while considering the fact that the family members of the assessee were earning (but were below taxable limits), and the deposits made were from the past savings and earnings of the entire family which were pooled together.
ITAT Chandigarh held that tax authorities cannot enforce any demand on the deductee if the amount of TDS deducted by the dedutor is not deposited with the Government.
ITAT Chandigarh held that registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act granted as the primary objects of the assessee society are aimed at the advancement of the object of general public utility within the meaning of section 2(15) of the Act
ITAT Chandigarh held that the aggregator/ intermediary (OLA) acts merely as an intermediary and hence not liable to deduct TDS u/s 194C on payments made to drivers.
CIT Cannot exercise Revisionary Powers under Section 263 of Income Tax arbitrarily without satisfying twin conditions for exercising of power
Assessee deserves one more opportunity to reconcile difference between contract receipts as shown in return of income & Form No. 26AS -ITAT
Held that deeming provisions of section 115BBE doesn’t apply as source of income clearly explained and established by the assessee
Charu Aggarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Held that cash sales made by the assessee which was deposited in the bank post demonetization is sufficient source of cash deposited. Addition of the same unsustainable. Facts- A notice u/s 153A was issued to the assessee post search operation. Thereafter, the assessee filed its ROI declaring an income […]
Held that the assessee entered into forex derivative transaction with the ICICI Bank to hedge the foreign currency risk involved in the transaction. Thus, expenses claimed were revenue in nature as the derivative transaction entered into by the assesse was not in the nature of speculative transaction.
