This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Ignorance of additional evidence and submission is patently and legally wrong
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Naveen Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Naveen Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
ITAT Chandigarh held that Ld. NFAC ignoring the submissions and the documents being sought to be filed as additional evidences and dismissal of assessee’s appeal without even commenting on the submissions or the documents is patently and legally wrong.
Facts-
Assessee had filed his return of income declaring taxable income of Rs. 2,34,920/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny through CASS for the reason of large value cash deposits during the demonetization period. The assessee was required to explain, by the AO, the source of cash deposits in th...





