Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Ignorance of additional evidence and submission is patently and legally wrong

Case Law Details

Case Name
Naveen Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement
Naveen Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) ITAT Chandigarh held that Ld. NFAC ignoring the submissions and the documents being sought to be filed as additional evidences and dismissal of assessee’s appeal without even commenting on the submissions or the documents is patently and legally wrong. Facts- Assessee had filed his return of income declaring taxable income of Rs. 2,34,920/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny through CASS for the reason of large value cash deposits during the demonetization period. The assessee was required to explain, by the AO, the source of cash deposits in th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *