Ignorance of additional evidence and submission is patently and legally wrong

Naveen Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)

ITAT Chandigarh held that Ld. NFAC ignoring the submissions and the documents being sought to be filed as additional evidences and dismissal of assessee’s appeal without even commenting on the submissions or the documents is patently and legally wrong.

Facts-

Assessee had filed his return of income declaring taxable income of Rs. 2,34,920/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny through CASS f

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.