Yeddula Harsha Vardhan wins appeal against DCIT at ITAT Hyderabad, as Rs. 4 lakhs addition under section 69A is deleted. Read the full verdict here.
ITAT Hyderabad held that the net balance of purchase consideration paid, and the value of net assets acquired is Goodwill and once the existence of Goodwill is established, Depreciation on such goodwill cannot be questioned further.
ITAT Hyderabad held that in absence of any substantial proceeding or collateral proceedings pending before AO, AO was right in not entertaining the application for rectification filed by the assessee.
ITAT Hyderabad held that once additional income offered during survey was simply accepted and assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act without invoking provisions of section 115BBE. Then, provisions of section 115BBE cannot be invoked via rectification as per section 154.
ITAT Hyderabad held that provisions of section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act are attracted on shares received by the assessee company on account of amalgamation.
ITAT Hyderabad held that non-generation/ non-quoting of Document Identification Number (DIN) in the order will render the order invalid and will be treated as never to have been issued.
ITAT Hyderabad held that statement of a third party already recorded u/s 132(4) of the Income Tax Act cannot be considered as an incriminating document for the purpose of making the addition u/s 153A of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Hyderabad held that addition towards unexplained cash deposit unsustainable as onus of establishing the creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction duly proved by the assessee.
ITAT Hyderabad held that FCCDs are debt hence interest paid/ payable on FCCDs in to be computed by applying LIBOR plus 200 basis points.
In the case of DCIT Vs Pravardhan Seeds Pvt. Ltd., ITAT Hyderabad ruled that agricultural activities for seed production qualify for tax exemption under section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act.
