Hiveloop Technology Pvt. Ltd. Vs Parle Products Private Limited (CCI) The Commission notes that, in respect of the assertion of the Informant of ‘must stock’ items, an attempt has been made to show that the stock of a particular type of biscuits of Parle is akin to ‘essential’. It is further claimed that it is […]
Whether the collection of PIS charges by Chhattisgarh Chemist and Druggist Association (CCDA) from pharmaceutical companies was made mandatory/compulsory by CCDA in contravention of provisions of Section 3 of Competition Act?
With regard to the filing of the criminal case against the Informant, the Commission notes that the same cannot be examined from the competition law perspective in the fact and circumstances of this case, as such litigation is not with any object of affecting competition but appears to be in the nature of proceedings toward recovery.
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited Vs Eastern Coalfields Limited (Competition Commission of India) The dispute in the present Information centres around the sampling procedure. The Informant alleges that the sampling policy of CIL, whereunder the referee samples are to be kept in the premises of ECL/similar subsidiaries of CIL, has made the sampling […]
The OP is stated to be a Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC) registered under the Companies Act, 1956 as well as with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and has been engaged in the business of lending money to the public and collecting deposits. The Informant is stated to be a consumer under Section 2(f) (ii) of the Act.
In re Private Entrepreneurs Godowns Association Vs Punjab State Warehousing Corporation (CCI) As far as the allegations of there being an anti-competitive agreement in violation of competition law amongst OP-1 and OP-2 are concerned, the Commission observes that the Informant, besides making bald allegations, has placed on record no material, which may even prima facie […]
In re House of Diagnostics LLP Vs Neurologica Corporation (CCI) It has been alleged by the Informant that OP-4 is the exclusive aftersales service provider of OP-1 in India with respect to the machine in question. On the other hand, OP-4 has replied that though it is the authorised service provider of aftersales services with […]
In re Hiveloop Technology Pvt. Ltd. Vs Britannia Industries Ltd. (CCI) The Commission finds that, with respect to the allegation of discrimination between the Informant and other distributors of Britannia, neither the Informant nor its group entity can be said to be similarly placed as other, more than three thousand, distributors of Britannia. In the […]
In re Vijay Gopal Vs Big Tree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (CCI) The exclusive and restrictive agreements of BookMyShow with single screen cinemas and multiplexes, in conjunction, prima facie appear to have the potential of denying market access to competing platforms and potential entrants. The cinema theatres as well as the cinegoers alike are restricted in […]
Ashwani Kumar Singla Vs Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (Competition Commission of India) The Commission observes that while determination of price of a drug and the aspects pertaining to its labeling may not be in the domain of the Commission, however, any unfair or discriminatory conduct in relation thereto by a dominant entity can be assessed […]
