Examine the Calcutta High Courts ruling in Usha Martin Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, highlighting how the court adjudicated on matters related to delayed appeals, e-Way Bill expiration, and tax levies.
The Union of India challenged the Central Administrative Tribunal’s order on upgrading the pay scale of Income Tax Officers. The Calcutta High Court ordered the formation of a Special Anomaly Committee to resolve the issue.
Calcutta High Court allows writ petition in the case of L.G. Balakrishnan & Bros Limited Vs ACIT, setting aside an earlier rejection of appeal due to a delay of 148 days. The court sets a cost of Rs. 40,000/- to be paid to WBGST Authority.
Calcutta High Court quashes interest demand and orders refund in Anita Tosniwal vs RBI case. Dispute over property ownership rights analyzed.
Dive into the Calcutta High Court’s verdict on the case of Newby Teas Overseas Private Limited Vs Joint Commissioner (Appeal), leading to a remand for readjudication of a customs refund claim.
Explore the recent judgment from the Calcutta High Court in the case of Datta Iron & Steel Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT, as the court mandates filing of an affidavit in opposition over the show cause notice issued by GST authorities.
Calcutta High Court quashed imposition of a 200% penalty on Bitumix India LLP for a violation related to an expired e-Way Bill. HC determined that while there was a violation, it was not grave enough to warrant such a high penalty. Instead, court directed appellants to pay a penalty of Rs. 50,000, which includes both CGST and WBGST.
Calcutta High Court has granted a stay on initiation of reassessment proceedings beyond 6 years in case of RPC Commercial LLP. Court found that jurisdiction of assessing officer to issue notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act was barred by limitation under Section 149(1)(a)/(1)(b).
A comprehensive analysis of Udaan Hotels & Resorts vs Union of India case and its implications on disclosing assessment materials under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act.
Calcutta High Court held that show cause notice not specifying the charge against the assessee is bad-in-law. Accordingly, initiation of the penalty proceedings is vitiated.
