Bombay High Court ruling emphasizes revenue officers’ obligation to adhere to appellate decisions in quasi-judicial matters, ensuring fair tax administration.
Learn from PCIT Vs Radhashir Jewellery Co. Pvt Ltd. case why comparing new and established businesses in transfer pricing is inappropriate. Detailed analysis provided.
Bombay High Court held that MVAT Authorities would not have priority in the recourse to the assets that are secured in favour of the secured creditor and registered in priority with the Central Registry of Securitisation Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest of India (CERSAI).
Saurer Textile Solutions Pvt Ltd Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) The Bombay High Court, in the case of Saurer Textile Solutions Pvt Ltd vs State of Maharashtra, has ruled that the Maharashtra government’s action in levying stamp duty on delivery orders (DOs) falls within the state’s legislative competence. The Court bench, comprised of […]
Bombay HC Dismisses Rs. 3731 Crore CGST Act Penalty Notice issued to Salaried Employee in the case of Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari Vs Union of India
The question before the Full Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, involved determining the obligations of a public trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act 1950, which operates an institution receiving state grants, under the Right to Information Act 2005 (RTI Act).
Bombay High Court overturns ruling categorizing body massager as adult sex toy, finding officer’s perception not backed by law. Read the detailed analysis.
Explore the Bombay High Court’s ruling on PCIT vs. ICICI Bank Ltd regarding accuracy in income reporting and the deletion of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act.
The Bombay High Court in Siemens India Ltd. v. Union of India holds that Input Service Distributors’ entitlement to transition Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be denied due to procedural lapses.
Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, without any fresh and tangible material, merely on the basis of change of opinion is unsustainable in law.
