Riddhi Siddhi Collection Vs Union of India and Ors (Bombay High Court) HC held that The objective of giving show cause notice is not an empty formality. The objective is to make the party aware of the case it has to meet. Thus time is given to respond to the same. The reduction of time […]
Bombay HC held that appeal proceedings are extension of assessment and Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal’s Judgment accepting C Forms is upheld.
Held that in a case where there exists an arbitration agreement, the court is under obligation to refer the parties to arbitration in terms of the arbitration agreement.
PCIT Vs Sandvik Asia Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court) The other issue arises for consideration is whether the losses sustained by hundred per cent EOU could be set off against the other business income of the assessee. This issue, however, is no longer res integra. In Hindustan Lever Ltd. V/s. Dy. CIT This Court observed […]
Colgate Palmolive (I) Limited Vs Union Of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) HC direct Govt to open the common GST portal for filing concerned forms for availing Transitional Credit through TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 for two months, i.e., with effect from 1st September, 2022 to 31st October, 2022 in compliance with the order of the […]
Payment made by electronic cash ledger maintained by petitioner under CGST Act also amounts to payment through internet banking for SVLDRS: HC
Shrikant Phulchand Bhakkad Vs JCIT (Bombay High Court) It was seen that the issue under consideration of the office had not been examined by the assessing officer while passing the assessment order. The transactions entered into by the assessee were non genuine and were carried out with a view to avoid paying tax. The assessee […]
Unichem Laboratories Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) (a) All Petitioners, through their respective units/offices registered under CGST Act and/or State Acts, as the case may be, can avail this window and file GST TRAN-1/revised GST TRAN-1 at the units/offices between 01.09.2022 to 31.10.2022 in terms of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order in […]
Bombay High Court stayed proceedings under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15. Initial notice was issued after time limit expired
Dilipkumar Premji Chheda Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Ajeet Manwani, learned counsel waives service for the Respondents. Objections be filed in six weeks. 2. Learned counsel for Petitioner states that the impugned notice dated 7th April, 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Act is unsustainable in law and in as […]
