Sponsored
    Follow Us:

ITAT Bangalore

Leasing charges allowable as Revenue expense if lessee have no ownership right over leased asset

January 18, 2022 3462 Views 0 comment Print

ThoughtWorks Technologies (India) Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) As per clause 4 of the agreement between the assessee and the First Leasing (lessor) the asset shall remain the exclusive property of the lessor (First Leasing) at all times. It further provides that the lessee at no time during the lease period can capitalize the […]

Amendment to Section 36(1)(va) & 43B of Income Tax Act not Retrospective

January 18, 2022 4704 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT hold that the amendment to section 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Act will not have application for the relevant assessment year, namely assessment year 2018-2019.

Provisions of section 115JB not applicable to banking company

January 18, 2022 2004 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT hold that the provisions of sec.115JB are not applicable to a banking company i.e. the assessee herein also. Having held that the provisions of sec.115JB are not applicable to the assessee, we are of the opinion that grounds No.19 to 22 need no adjudication at this stage.

Education cess cannot be disallowed under section 40(a)(ii)

January 17, 2022 2424 Views 0 comment Print

LG Soft India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Sesa Goa Limited v. JCIT (supra) had held education cess is an allowable expenditure as the word ‘cess’ is conspicuously absent under the provisions of section 40(a)(ii) of the I.T.Act The Hon’ble High Court also placed reliance […]

Saving of Rs. 2.5 Lakh by 80 Year Old Assessee cannot be doubted: ITAT

January 16, 2022 1476 Views 0 comment Print

M. K. Kempasiddaiah Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Since no documentary evidence was filed, the AO treated the sum of Rs.2,50,000/- was unexplained investment which the CIT(A) confirmed. It is the plea of the assessee that the assessee is a 80 years old person and his savings to the extent of Rs.2,50,000/- cannot be doubted. After […]

Penalty cannot be imposed merely for non-filing of Audit Report Electronically

January 11, 2022 7026 Views 0 comment Print

SLV Housing Development Corporation Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The tax authorities have pointed out time gap in getting a tax audit report from a new CA. However, it is a known fact that it might have taken some time to severe relationship with the earlier CA. However, the fact remains that the tax audit report […]

RPM method used by Taxpayer cannot be rejected without pointing defect in the same

January 11, 2022 2931 Views 0 comment Print

Randox Laboratories India Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)  The facts on record reveal that the Transfer Pricing Officer under a misconception that the assessee has undertaken manufacturing activity has rejected RPM. Learned DRP has also not examined the facts in proper perspective. Rather, learned DRP has recorded an erroneous finding by stating that in […]

No reassessment in absence of failure on part of assessee to fully & truly disclose all material facts

January 3, 2022 1842 Views 0 comment Print

District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bengalore) Conclusion: Reassessment beyond four years was not valid in the absence of failure on part of assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. Held: Assessee claimed deduction of Rs.3,50,00,000/- u/s 36(1)(viia). However, assessee debited only Rs.3,00,00,000/- to the profit and loss […]

TDS on advertisement expenses paid to Facebook, Tapjoy etc. -ITAT Restores matter to AO

December 27, 2021 5979 Views 0 comment Print

Moonfrog Labs Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The Ld.CIT(A) held that the advertisement expenses paid to Facebook and other entities constitutes use of industrial, commercial or scientific equipment under section 9(1)(vi) of the Act whether active or passive and hence ‘Royalty’ under the Act. As regards taxability as ‘“Fees for technical services’, it was […]

Amended provisions of section 43B & 36(1)(va) not applicable for AYs prior to AY 2021-22

December 25, 2021 2625 Views 0 comment Print

Eskay Heat Transfers Private Limited Vs ADIT (ITAT Bangalore) Till Assessment Year (AY) 2020-2021 Assessee would be entitled to deduction of employees’ contribution to PF and ESI provided that the payments were made prior to the due date of filing of the return of income u/s 139(1) of the I.T.Act as Amendment by Finance Act, […]

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031