In re Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirapalli (GST AAR Tamilnadu) 1. Whether Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirappalli (IIM) is a Government Entity under GST Law. The Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirappalli (IIM) is a Government Entity Under GST Law. 2. If the answer to question is in the affirmative, whether 2.1 The applicant is liable […]
In re KLF Nirmal Industries Private Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) 1. Whether the company is eligible to take input tax credit as inputs/capital goods or input services of the items used in Design, Engineering, Supply, Execution (EPC) of 265KW Roof top Grid Solar PV Power Plant as per MNRE & IEC Standards? it is seen […]
In re Bhavya Srishti Udhyog Private Limited (GST AAR Chhattisgarh) GST classification of the product namely Waterproof tells support for climbing plants manufactured by using bamboo and high – density polythlene Applicant’s product named “Waterproof Trellis support for climbing. plants using bamboo and High-Density Polyethylene” are not eligible for exemption provided under sr. no. 137 of […]
In re RIICO, Tilak Marg (GST AAAR Rajasthan) Input Tax Credit is not only restricted to the goods and services used for construction of immovable property (whether capitalized or not) but also restricted for those goods and services which are used for re-construction, renovation, additions or alterations or repairs, to the extent of capitalization, to […]
In re Bhopal Dugdh Sangh Sahakari Maryadit (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Authority is of the view that based within the meaning of Section 97 of the GST Acts, an application for Advance Ruling can only be made to determine the ‘liability to pay tax’ on any goods or services or both. The Applicant himself accepts […]
In re Dhanraj Organics Private Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) AAR ruled that Epoxidised Soya bean Oil is rightly classifiable under tariff item 1518 and GST @5% is leviable as the said product is specifically covered under the entry no.90 of Schedule-I of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.07.2017. as amended from time to […]
AAR held that, that mere acceptance of joint custody of goods without rights, privileges of ownership of goods does not amount to supply.
In re Thermo Fisher Scientific India Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question : Whether Applicant is correct in charging 2.5% CGST and SGST or 5% IGST, as applicable, by applying Notification No. 45/2017-Central Tax (Rate), Notification No. 45/2017 -S.T.(Rate) and Notification No. 47/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) all dated 14.11.2017 on the scientific and technical instruments/ equipment […]
In re M P Enterprises & Associates Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- Whether the service of operating mini AC buses by the applicant for Brihan Mumbai Electricity Supply Transport Undertaking (BEST) would be exempt from payment of GST under Tariff Heading 9966 i.e. ‘services by way of giving on hire to a state transport […]
In re Udupi Nirmithi Kendra (GST AAR Karnataka) In the first scenario, since the value of the single invoice is more than Rs.2.5 lakh, there is no doubt that the tax deduction at source is applicable under section 51 subject to other conditions. In the second scenario, the applicant has clearly stated that the value […]
