In re Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) The Board Circular No. 20/2013-Cus. refers to ‘Tablet Computers’ that can be programmed in a variety of ways. HMT device doesn’t appear to be amenable to be programmed in various ways. It also held that the tablet computers are those devices which have essentially the same […]
In re superintendent Model Jail Chandigarh (GST AAR Chandigarh) ♦ Whether (a) Modal jail, Chandigarh and (b) Prisoner Training Rehabilitation and Welfare Society (Model Jail, Vocational Institute) is Government, Government Authority, Local Authority or Government entity; ♦ Whether furniture items manufacture by jail inmates are liable for GST, if supplied to a. Government, Government Authority, […]
In re Uwas Recycler LLP (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR held that goods ‘mill processed non-alloy ferrous waste metal goods wound in coil’ does not appear to be waste or scrap, and therefore, not classifiable under sub heading 72044900. These goods merit classification under subheading 72099000. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, […]
In re Sh. Sunil Chandrana (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR rules that Glyteine (Gamma Glutamylcysteine), packaged in 415 mg. sachets and branded as Continual-G merits classification under sub-heading 21069099 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAI Ruling An application for advance ruling […]
In re V. L. Traders (GST AAR Gujarat) i. the applicant has suppressed the material facts that DGGI had initiated inquiry with respect to the same Questions raised in the subject Application and that the proceedings initiated by DGGI vide relevant sections of CGST Act was initiated prior to filing of subject Advance Ruling application. […]
In re Gensol Ventures Pvt.Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) 1. Whether the applicant is liable to be registered and classified under the Category of E-Commerce Operator? M/s Gensol is an e-commerce operator and shall be liable to be registered. 2. Whether the applicant is liable to pay or discharge Goods & Service Tax(GST) in accordance to […]
In re Airport Authority of India (GST AAR Gujarat) 1. Whether the transfer of business by the AAI to the M/s. Adani Ahmedabad International Airport Limited be treated as Supply u/s. 7 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST”) viz-a-viz Gujarat State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (“GSGST”)? The Subject Supply […]
In re Supercoat India (Trade Name) Ayush Baid (Legal Name) (GST AAR Gujarat) i. The applicant supplies partially coated Polyester fabric ( knitted/woven) or partially coated fabric. ii. Said fabric is scattered with micro-dot printing. iii. The subject goods are used as interlining fabric. iv. The resultant fabric is partially coated on one side with […]
The applicant is providing hostel on the rent to various students where fees charged per student per day per room is much less than Rs. 1000/- per day per person. Therefore, considering the provisions of notification Entry No. 14, and clarification given by CBIC in circular No. 32/06/2018-GST dated 12th February 2018, it is held that, the applicant’s activity is satisfying the conditions of Entry Sr.no. 14 of said Notification and hence would be exempt from taxes.
Other Charges are different from the service of construction of residential flats. It cannot be said to be naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other. The amount and consideration is separately for different services. Therefore, the Other Charges are not covered under Composite Supply of Services
