Read about the case of Aark Infosoft Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) where the assessment was deemed void due to a delayed Section 143(2) notice.
ITAT upholds PCIT’s decision on erroneous assessment orders in tax evasion case. Changela’s appeals dismissed as inadequate inquiries led to erroneous orders.
Analyzing the case of Sunil Dhirubhai Patel vs ITO, where expenses were disallowed despite not being claimed by the assessee, and how the ITAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the assessee.
Yala Construction Co. Pvt Ltd’s disallowances upheld by ITAT Delhi include depreciation, interest on loan, commission, and sponsorship fee. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
ITAT Ahmedabad quashes penalties under Section 271(1)(b) & 271F of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that income determination in assessment orders cannot dictate filing of ITRs.
Discover the case of Brahmaputra Property Hub Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Guwahati) regarding Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn why detailed inquiry matters.
Explore the case of DCIT Vs. Bengal Brahmaputra Realty Limited (ITAT Guwahati) and understand the significance of incriminating material in income tax assessments for completed or unabated years.
ITAT Chennai held that rejection of application in Form No. 10AB for seeking approval u/s. 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act by treating it as time barred under gist that CBDT circular no. 22/2022 dated 01.11.2022 didn’t provide extension of time limit is unjustified.
ITAT Delhi held that that cash sales that is already offered as income cannot be taxed in the grab of inflation sales to cover up demonetization currency. Accordingly, addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act directed to be deleted.
Detailed analysis of Chandarani N. Goyal Vs ITO case where Mumbai ITAT ruled that money received as a security deposit, if refunded, is not taxable under section 56(2)(vii)(a) of the Income Tax Act.
