Czarnikow Group Limited Vs Senior Intelligence Officer (Madras High Court) Facts- The issue to be decided in the present matter is thus whether the ownership of the asset vests in the petitioner or RS, which in turn, would determine, as a consequence, whether the NCLT is the appropriate forum to adjudicate the petitioner’s prayers, including […]
Thomas Cherian Vs CBI Thiruvananthapuram Unit (Kerala High Court) Facts- The case relates to loan transactions conducted in the State Bank of Travancore, Main Branch, Kottayam. The substance of the allegations against the accused is that loan was sanctioned on the basis of fictitious and forged documents, pursuant to a conspiracy hatched by the bank […]
Meta Tiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Hon’ble Bombay High Court issues notice in challenge to Constitutional validity of 16(4) of the CGST Act In terms of section 16(4) of the Central GST Act and Maharashtra GST Act, a taxpayer is not entitled to take input tax credit in respect of any […]
Maa Durga Plastic Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) Constitutional validity of Section 140(5) of the CGST Act to the extent that it denies ITC on capital goods in transit challenged before Hon’ble Calcutta High Court Maa Durga Plastic has filed a writ petition vide W.P.A. No. 10340 of 2021 before the Hon’ble Calcutta High […]
In re Mallcom India Limited (Uttarakhand High Court) Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court issues notice to the GST Department coercive recovery regarding demand of ITC due to misclassification of goods by the supplier Mallcom India Limited has filed a writ petition vide WPMS No. 1206 of 2021 before the Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court seeking refund of […]
P.S.Shanmuga Sundaram Vs Director Treasuries and Accounts Department (Madras High Court) Facts- The Petitioners are in the business of vending stamp papers since 1988 and holding valid licenses. The grievance of the Writ Petitioners is that since January, 2015, the Respondents are illegally demanding the Petitioners to deposit Rs.15/- for every bundle of currency, i.e., bundle […]
From a conjoint reading of Section 2(1)(j)(A), Section 2(1)(o)(i), Section 3, Section 5 and Section 6 of the DTVSV Act, it is clear that there is no provision in the DTVSV Act, which authorises recovery of interest paid earlier by the Department under Section 244A as disputed tax, there being no statutory mandate for the Designated Authority to recover interest as disputed tax in the manner sought to be done in this case.
HC held that is not proper on the part of State Bank of India to collect cash handling charges from the stamp vendors. Accordingly, the Second and Third Respondents have failed to establish that they have the authority to collect cash handling charges from the stamp vendors, who all are depositing money through Treasury Challans for purchase of stamps.
HC held that in a case where assessee is accused of passing on fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) without actual moment of goods, a reasoned order must be passed by Joint Commissioner of State Tax, after acknowledging all the relevant material and contentions that the assessee may produce to satisfy the authorities.
The plea by assessee to quash Enforcement Directorate summons in a money laundering case was quashed as assessee had failed to make out a case for interference for the invocation of 226 of the Constitution and 482 of Cr.P.C.
