Sudhir Desh Ahuja Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre & Ors (Delhi High Court) Impugned orders are liable to be set aside for the following reasons: (i) Firstly, the AO failed to deal with the request of the petitioner, for according an adjournment in the matter. Wife and son of the petitioner were admitted to hospital […]
The petitioner, being an assessee under Telangana GST Act, 2017, CGST Act, 2017, and IGST Act, 2017 is issued a letter specifying, Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by them are on the basis of fake invoices issued by certain fictitious suppliers/firms. The letter further specifies that, ITC availed by the petitioner is in a fraudulent manner without receiving any material, and the petitioner was requested to reverse ITC on such invoices.
Prafull Kumar Vs State of U.P (Allahabad High Court) It is common knowledge that there is mounting pendency in the Courts. The Judiciary blames the Bar for their disinclination to wrap up the cases by seeking regular adjournments and filing frivolous applications to stall the process of law. The Judiciary is also concerned with the […]
Unutilised ITC is an asset and a statutory right in the hands of the dealer that cannot be defeated by any procedural rules on account of technical glitches. Further held that, granting an opportunity of hearing is only to enable the process of decision-making simpler and it is one of the basic principles of natural justice and such technical issues do not stand in the way of rendering justice.
Ranchi Carrying Corporation Vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Allahabad High Court) By the impugned orders the authorities below have rejected the claim of the petitioner on the ground that the details mentioned in the invoices at serial nos.1 to 9 are not matching with the verifying sheets available with the mobile squad. This much is also […]
Ajay Mittal Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Hon’ble Delhi High Court on validity of 19 notices issued u/s 148(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 restraining the Revenue from continuing with the reassessment proceedings, in any manner, pursuant to the impugned notices. FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT 1. On 13th July, 2021, this […]
Commissioner of Customs Custom House Vs Venkateshwara Paper Boards (Madras High Court) the request for mutilation was much after seizure of the goods. On and after 31.01.2020, stock lot goods are prohibited. Therefore, the issue would be if there are three varieties of paper bundled into one, whether it would fall within the definition of […]
S R & Sons Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) (Madras High Court) This Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner has emphatically stated that he has no grievance against the order in original dated 11.11.2020 and his grievance is against the charging of interest under Section 50 of the Central Goods and Services […]
Bhagwati Prasad Jalan Vs Union Of India And Ors. (Calcutta High Court) The learned Advocate for the respondents is not able to deny the allegations of the petitioners that Section 148A provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not complied with in this case before issuing notice under Section 148 of the said Act and […]
Civitech Developers Private Limited Vs National E-Assessment Centre (Delhi High Court) Personal hearing, if prayed, should be allowed else E-assessment order vitiates for non compliance of statutory provisions & Principles of Natural Justice The scheme of faceless E- Assessment provides for personal hearing in certain circumstances. In case where the request for personal video link […]
