CIT Vs Ayshwarya Sea Food Pvt. Ltd. (Madras High Court) on facts, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal held that the assessee had purchased shrimp products from a supplier at Nellore and the explanation given by them at the first instance before the Assessing Officer is that they are doing shrimp feed […]
V.P. Zacharia Vs State of Kerala (Kerala High Court) his is a case where the 2nd respondent/accused has been successful in rebutting the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The fact that there was an earlier transaction in the year 1995 and that liability had been settled by repayment is a […]
North End Food Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of U P (Allahabad High Court) The preconditions for the exercise of powers are basically two folds, namely, error in the order passed by an officer subordinate to the revisional authority and prejudice to the interest of revenue. Once these two conditions stood fulfilled, it was incumbent […]
Kuppan Gounder P.G.Natarajan Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (Madras High Court) Let us consider the scope of Section 6(2)(b) of the Act. It contemplates that “where a proper officer under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, […]
Implement Impex Private Limited Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) The grievance that has been voiced in this writ petition is that despite lapse of more than a year from the date provisional attachment of the petitioner’s bank account was ordered, the Joint Commissioner has not lifted such order of provisional attachment. In ground […]
Assessee is engaged in the business of life insurance. AO completed the assessment treating the surplus under shareholders account as income from business and taxed at normal rates.
IL & FS Financial Services Limited Vs SEBI (Bombay High Court) Conclusion: Show-cause notice issued for imposition of penalty under section 15HB and 15A(b) of the SEBI Act for violating the provisions of LODR Regulations was according to section 15-I(3) with second proviso or not, that could be decided by the authority at the time […]
Krishan Agarwal Vs. PCIT (Delhi High Court) This Court is of the opinion that technology is intended to ease and facilitate transactions and cannot be used as a basis for harassing an assessee by asking him to repeatedly file unnecessary and irrelevant forms. This Court is also of the view that the software and the […]
The claim of the petitioners with regard to the ‘flow measuring devices’ not being installed by the Commission under Section 14.1 of the Act falls in the third alternative of adopting an indirect method for assessment of water drawn by the user.
Narula Menthol Vs UOI & Ors. (Uttarakhand High Court) 1. Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court has quashed the demand intimation letters issued by the GST Dept. which directed the Petitioner to reverse the ITC amounting to Rs. 1.75 Cr on the basis that the supplier from whom the goods were purchased, has failed to deposit the […]
