First Appellate Authority under TNVAT Act cannot travel beyond subject matter of assessment – Saint Gobain Glass India Ltd. Vs Appellate Joint Commissioner (CT) (Madras High Court)
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court quashed the recovery Notice issued by SEBI as no opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner and no mechanism/ calculation was provided by the recovery officer on the basis of which demand could be sustained.
Notification pertaining to the ban on Online Rummy was declared as arbitrary, illegal and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to assessee under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and hence not enforceable.
Bhimendra Kumar Goyal Vs Enforcement Directorate (Andhra Pradesh High Court) Hon’ble Apex Court in catena of cases observed that while granting bail the Court has to keep in mind the nature of accusation, the nature of evidence in support thereof, the severity of the punishment which conviction will entail, the character of the accused, circumstances […]
Petitioner is found to have deliberately supplied goods without issuing invoices in violation of the provisions of AGST Act with intention to evade Tax during the period of 2019 to 2021.
CIT Vs John Ettimootil Samuel (Madras High Court) The Tribunal, in our view, rightly took note of the fact that the reopening of the assessment was after four years and there was no tangible material to establish that the assessee failed to disclose fully and truly all materials, which are required for the assessment at […]
Bharat Electronics Limited Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Madras High Court) Section 120A grants only one opportunity to the petitioner to rectify the Form TRAN-1 and there is, in my view, no basis for such restriction. In this case, the last dates for filing of TRAN-1, and seeking revision of the same are […]
In the present case, the error is seen to be inadvertent, constituting a human error. The Revenue does not dispute this either. Moreover, the era of GST is nascent and I am of the view that a rigid view should not be taken in procedural matters such as the present one.
AB Traders Vs State of Gujarat & 1 Other(S) (Gujarat High Court) 1. The petitioner, which is a proprietorship firm, received order for purchase of arecanut from a buyer in New Delhi. The petitioner appointed transporter for such transportation. It was specifically conveyed to the transporter that movement of goods was to be commenced only […]
R.Shanmugam Pillai & Sons Vs Designated Committee (Madras High Court) No denial of SVLDRS benefit by treating assessee under arrears category on basis of numbering of appeal and pending adjudication before CESTAT Conclusion: Even though assessee filed an appeal on 10 days prior to the cut off date before the CESTAT, therefore, on 30.06.2019, in […]
