Follow Us:

All CESTAT

Suppression of facts has to be “Wilful” for recovery of CENVAT Credit

August 11, 2021 8403 Views 0 comment Print

Emaar MGF Land Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and CGST (CESTAT Delhi) M/s. Emaar MGF Land Ltd. (Appellant) has filed the current appeal for quashing Order-In-Original No. DLI-SVTAX-001-COM-054-16-17 dated March 31, 2017 (OIO) which confirmed recovery of Central Value Added Tax Credit “CENVAT Credit) along with interest and penalty under Section 73(1) of the […]

Service tax excess paid and which could not be adjusted owing to transition to GST is refundable to assessee and limitation cannot be cited for denial

August 10, 2021 1110 Views 0 comment Print

Manoj Vijay Vs Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Since post July 01, 2017, the applicability of Rule 6 (4A) of Central Excise Rules was no more available to the appellant, the excess amount already got deposited by the appellant at the time when Service Tax liability for the said quarter had not […]

Giving of loans by Banks to Borrowers is not a service

August 9, 2021 3129 Views 0 comment Print

State Bank of Patiala Vs Commissioner, Central Excise and Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Appellant urges that the show cause notice is misconceived, as prima facie giving of loans is not an output service, rather money in real terms somewhat akin to goods, goes out of the bank when the loan is advanced. […]

CESTAT reduces Penalty from Rs. 1 crore to 1 Lakh in Rough Diamond Smuggling case

August 8, 2021 2403 Views 0 comment Print

Jorabhai Valabhai Rabari Desai Vs C.C. Ahmedabad (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Shri Jorabhai Valabhai Rabari @ Desai and Shri Premabhai Jethabhai Attya @ Patel (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Appellants‘) have filed Appeals against the impugned O-I-O NO. AHM-CUSTM-OOO-COM-004-2018-19 dated 25-04-2018 issued by the Principal Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad wherein a Penalty u/s 112(b) of Customs Act […]

Mere Delay in debiting CENVAT A/c will not defeat substantial right of refund

August 8, 2021 1044 Views 0 comment Print

Thorogood Associates India Private Limited Vs Commissioner Of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) In present case, the appellant has complied with the conditions prescribed under para 2(h) of the Notification No.27/2012 and debited the CENVAT account on 31.3.2018 though there was some delay in debiting the CENVAT account but the delay in debiting the CENVAT account […]

Activity of filling gas received through pipeline into cylinders by compression not amounts to manufacture

August 4, 2021 1332 Views 0 comment Print

Popular Carbonic Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) (i) The issue is to whether the process of compressing carbondioxide and subsequent filling in cylinder amounts to manufacture in terms of Chapter Note 9 to Chapter 28 of the Tariff Act has been settled in favour of the appellant by the Tribunal in […]

Service tax refund cannot be denied on Legal Export of goods although procured through illegal means

August 4, 2021 1554 Views 0 comment Print

V.V. Minerals [100% EOU] Vs Commissioner of GST & CE (CESTAT Chennai) Unless there Is any provision to the contrary, the charging sections of the tax laws apply to illegal acts as they apply to legal acts and therefore tax is leviable notwithstanding that action for the illegal actions may be taken under some other […]

Procedural irregularity in ISD distribution is revenue neutral & will not effect substantive right of appellant

August 4, 2021 3414 Views 0 comment Print

Maini Precision Products Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) In the present case, the learned Commissioner has confirmed the demand of CENVAT credit on the grounds that the appellant has failed to distribute the credit to its various units regarding common input service. The defence of the appellant that after the implementation of […]

Period of Limitation increased to 18 Months w.e.f. 28.05.2012

August 4, 2021 4506 Views 0 comment Print

Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Baran Vs Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Division (CESTAT Delhi) There is no dispute that the relevant date in the present case is 25.11.2012. Prior to this date on 28.05.2012, section 73(1) of the Finance Act was amended and it was provided that the Central Excise Officer could issue a notice […]

CENVAT Credit cannot be denied on the ground that supplier was not liable to pay duty on goods supplied

August 3, 2021 2253 Views 0 comment Print

GEMSCAB Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner Central Goods (CESTAT Delhi) In view of the observed admission and settled law, the question of adjudication is answered in negative holding that CENVAT Credit cannot be denied on the ground that the supplier was not liable to pay the duty on the goods supplied. Also it is observed that […]

Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930