xplore the case of Shakti Cargo Movers vs. Commissioner of Customs at CESTAT Delhi, where the court ruled that a customs broker cannot be held responsible if a client fails to inform authorities of an address change.
Understand the case of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs Commissioner regarding shampoo sachet assessable value under Central Excise Act.
Dive into the customs duty exemption dispute between Halbit Avionics Pvt Ltd and the Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore). Detailed analysis of imports for aircraft upgradation and eligibility for duty exemption.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Chennai order on the classification of Sweet Pearl P200 containing 99% Maltitol Crystals. Analysis, conclusion, and consequential benefits discussed.
CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling emphasizes customs adherence to DGFT notifications. In Specta Decor Pvt Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs case, a redemption fine is reduced due to unforeseen circumstances.
In the case of Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Customs, CESTAT Chennai allows re-credit of customs duty in advance authorisation scrips.
Hindustan Distributors Vs Commissioner of Customs case analysis. CESTAT Chandigarh quashes redemption fine and penalty on prime pre-painted steel coils.
Royalty and other charges are not includible in assessable value if Payment of royalty and other charges not for imported goods and not a condition of sale of goods
CESTAT Delhi rules in favor of Honda Cars India, affirming reduced 15% penalty under Customs Act Section 28(5) if paid within 30 days of SCN receipt.
Duties of Customs are to be charged on the goods imported into India (section 12) and not on the goods said to have been imported into India.
