Case Law Details
Wrigley India Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
The case of Wrigley India Pvt Ltd versus the Commissioner of Customs revolves around the classification of ‘Sweet Pearl P200,’ primarily containing 99% Maltitol Crystals. This detailed analysis delves into the dispute, expert opinions, and the decision rendered by CESTAT Chennai.
The importer-appellant, Wrigley India Pvt Ltd, challenged the Order in Original issued by the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai, disputing the classification of ‘Sweet Pearl P200.’ The appellant classified the goods under Tariff Item 29054900, while the Revenue proposed reclassification under Tariff Item 21069060.
The dispute stemmed from the Revenue’s contention that the goods were artificial sweeteners and food flavoring materials, while the appellant argued for classification as polyhydric alcohols under Tariff Item 2905. Expert opinions from the Expert Inspection Agency (EIA) and Central Food Laboratory, Mysore, were sought, but their findings were not adequately considered in the impugned order.
The appellant presented evidence supporting the classification under Tariff Item 2905, citing previous practices and chemical composition. Despite the Revenue’s assertions, they failed to substantiate their case for reclassification.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
