Analysis of Alstom T & D India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise case, exemption from excise duty, and CESTAT Chennai’s decision.
Analysis of the CESTAT Chennai ruling in Commissioner of Customs vs. GH Induction India Pvt. Ltd. regarding exclusion of royalty and technical know-how fees from assessable value for customs duty calculation.
Explore CESTAT Chandigarh order allowing Cenvat Credit for Sari Guard and Mirror Assembly in case of Hero Motorcorp Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise.
Analyze CESTAT Mumbai’s ruling in Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, focusing on ‘unjust enrichment’ and CA certificate’s role in excise duty cases.
Analyze CESTAT Chennai order in Hi Tours Mamallapuram Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, focusing on non-taxability of mark-up for booking domestic travel tickets.
Analyze the CESTAT Kolkata order in Jai Balaji Industries Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, highlighting the issue of levying Service Tax on actual transportation charges, not on provisions.
Analyze the CESTAT Mumbai order in S K Universal Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Customs, highlighting the determination of ‘cut and polished diamonds’ value and its consistency with Customs Valuation Rules.
Read about Madan Kumar’s case where CESTAT Kolkata upholds the confiscation of betel nuts due to failure in providing evidence of legitimacy. Learn more about this customs dispute.
CESTAT Ahmedabad’s decision on penalty under Customs Act for fabricated DEPB scrips. Analysis of the case, rulings, and implications.
Analysis of CESTAT Ahmedabad’s ruling on eligibility to use Cenvat credit for service tax payment when engaged in both manufacturing and services. Case details and conclusion.
