Case Law Details

Case Name : Indian Bank Association and Others Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition (civil) no.18 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/04/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (990)

CA Sandeep Kanoi

Honourable Supreme Court (SC) has issued following guideline in the case of  Indian Bank Association v. Union of India :-


(1) Immediate cognizance- Magistrate/Judicial Magistrate (MM/JM), on the day when the complaint under section 138 of the Act is presented, shall scrutinize the complaint and, if the complaint is accompanied by the affidavit, and the affidavit and the documents, if any, are found to be in order, take cognizance and direct issuance of summons.

(2) Notice via email also– MM/JM should adopt a pragmatic and realistic approach while issuing summons. Summons must be properly addressed and sent by post as well as by e-mail address got from the complainant. Court, in appropriate cases, may take the assistance of the police or the nearby Court to serve notice to the accused. For notice of appearance, a short date be fixed. If the summons is received back un-served, immediate follow up action be taken.

(3) Instant Settlement – Court may indicate in the summon that if the accused makes an application for compounding of offences at the first hearing of the case and, if such an application is made, Court may pass appropriate orders at the earliest.

(4) Quick Trial – Court should direct the accused, when he appears to furnish a bail bond, to ensure his appearance during trial and ask him to take notice under section 251Cr.P.C. to enable him to enter his plea of defence and fix the case for defence evidence, unless an application is made by the accused under section 145(2) for re-calling a witness for cross-examination.

(5) Time bound Disposal – The Court concerned must ensure that examination-in-chief, cross-examination and re-examination of the complainant must be conducted within three months of assigning the case. The Court has option of accepting affidavits of the witnesses, instead of examining them in Court. Witnesses to the complaint and accused must be available for cross-examination as and when there is direction to this effect by the Court.

All the Criminal Courts in the country dealing with section 138 cases shall follow the above-mentioned procedures for speedy and expeditious disposal of cases falling under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Download Judgment/Order

Author Bio

Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Taxguru / Sandeep Kanoi & Associates
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
Member Since: 27 Feb 2017 | Total Posts: 611
A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

More Under Corporate Law

Posted Under

Category : Corporate Law (3970)
Type : Featured (4029) Judiciary (11763)

0 responses to “Revised SC guideline in Cheque Bounce Cases U/s. Section 138 (NI Act)”

  1. sharad fadnis says:

    Nice article in a nutshell

  2. Uday Patel says:

    Excellent article, highly impressed. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *