NCDRC it is not required to re-assess & re-appreciate evidence on record when findings of lower fora are concurrent on facts

Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank Of India) Vs Rajendra Maharana & Anr. (NCDRC Delhi)

Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI (NCDRC) have observed that in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction of the Commission it is not required to re-assess and re-appreciate the evidence on record when the findings of the lower fora are concurrent on facts. It can interfere with the concurrent findings of the fora belo

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.