This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
NCDRC it is not required to re-assess & re-appreciate evidence on record when findings of lower fora are concurrent on facts
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank Of India) Vs Rajendra Maharana & Anr. (NCDRC Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCDRC/SCDRC
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank Of India) Vs Rajendra Maharana & Anr. (NCDRC Delhi)
Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI (NCDRC) have observed that in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction of the Commission it is not required to re-assess and re-appreciate the evidence on record when the findings of the lower fora are concurrent on facts. It can interfere with the concurrent findings of the fora below only on the grounds that the findings are either perverse or that the fora below have acted without jurisdicti...
Author Info
