This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Extension of Payment Time in Resolution Plan not constitute plan modification
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ashok Dattatray Atre Vs State Bank of India (NCLAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ashok Dattatray Atre Vs State Bank of India (NCLAT Delhi)
n the case of Ashok Dattatray Atre vs. State Bank of India, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Delhi deliberated on whether an extension of time for payment under a resolution plan constituted a modification of the plan or a withdrawal from it. The issue arose in response to a submission by the State Bank of India (SBI) that the resolution plan, once approved, could not be modified or withdrawn, citing the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd. vs. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions L...
Author Info
