Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Britannia Industries Ltd. Vs Bombay Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee & Anr. (Supreme Court)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 1746 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/01/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Britannia Industries Ltd. Vs Bombay Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee & Anr. (Supreme Court)

Supreme Court has upheld High Court Order holding that edible oil, Vanaspati and Sugar are covered under he definition of agricultural produce under Section 2(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, for the purpose of levy of market fee.

FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT

1. The issue involved in these appeals is the interpretation of the term “Agricultural Produce” (Section 2(1)(a) of the Act) contained in the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

2. The appellant filed the writ petition seeking the following declarations:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031