Case Law Details
Case Name : Britannia Industries Ltd. Vs Bombay Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee & Anr. (Supreme Court)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 1746 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/01/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Supreme Court of India
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Britannia Industries Ltd. Vs Bombay Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee & Anr. (Supreme Court)
Supreme Court has upheld High Court Order holding that edible oil, Vanaspati and Sugar are covered under he definition of agricultural produce under Section 2(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, for the purpose of levy of market fee.
FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT
1. The issue involved in these appeals is the interpretation of the term “Agricultural Produce” (Section 2(1)(a) of the Act) contained in the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.
2. The appellant filed the writ petition seeking the following declarations:
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.