Follow Us:

Dematerialisation of Securities of Private Limited Companies: A Comprehensive Analysis – A Comprehensive Analysis of MCA Notifications and Compliance Requirements Under the Companies Act, 2013

Introduction:

In an era where digital transformation has revolutionized every aspect of business operations, the securities market has not remained untouched. The shift from physical share certificates to electronic records – known as dematerialisation – has fundamentally changed how companies manage their shareholding structures. While this transformation has been mandatory for public and listed companies for years, a significant regulatory shift occurred on October 27, 2023, when the Ministry of Corporate Affairs extended mandatory dematerialisation requirements to private limited companies through a landmark notification.

This development marks a watershed moment in Indian corporate governance, affecting over 1.4 million private companies across the country. Understanding the implications of dematerialisation, the specific MCA notifications, relevant provisions under the Companies Act 2013, and the consequences of non-compliance is now crucial for private company directors, shareholders, and compliance officers navigating today’s regulatory landscape.

Understanding Dematerialisation:

Dematerialisation is the process of converting physical share certificates into electronic form, maintained in depository accounts. Introduced in India through the Depositories Act, 1996, this system operates through two primary depositories – the National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) and the Central Depository Services Limited (CDSL) – which work with various Depository Participants to facilitate the process.

The concept is simple yet powerful: instead of holding paper certificates that can be lost, damaged, or forged, shareholders maintain their securities in electronic accounts, much like bank accounts for money. Every transaction, transfer, or pledge is recorded electronically, creating a transparent and efficient system.

The Legal Framework: Section 29 of the Companies Act, 2013

The legal foundation for dematerialisation in India rests on Section 29 of the Companies Act, 2013, which was notified on September 12, 2013. This section originally mandated that companies making public offers and certain other prescribed classes of public companies must issue securities only in dematerialised form by complying with the Depositories Act, 1996.

Section 29 consists of several critical sub-sections that form the backbone of dematerialisation requirements:

Section 29(1) provides that companies making public offers and such other classes of public companies as may be prescribed shall issue securities only in dematerialised form. The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019 significantly altered this provision by removing the word “public” from Section 29(1)(b), thereby expanding its scope beyond just public companies.

Section 29(1A), inserted through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019 with effect from August 15, 2019, represents a crucial evolution in the legislative framework. This sub-section empowers the Central Government to prescribe such classes of unlisted companies for which securities shall be held or transferred only in dematerialised form in the manner laid down in the Depositories Act, 1996. This provision effectively granted the government authority to extend dematerialisation requirements to private companies through delegated legislation.

Section 29(2) provides flexibility to companies not covered under sub-section (1), allowing them to either convert their securities into dematerialised form or issue securities in physical form in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act or in dematerialised form in accordance with the Depositories Act, 1996.

This legislative framework demonstrates Parliament’s intent to progressively digitize the entire corporate securities ecosystem while granting the executive the flexibility to prescribe specific timelines and classes of companies through subordinate legislation.

Rule 9 and the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014

The Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, promulgated on April 1, 2014, operationalize the provisions of Section 29. Rule 9 of these rules initially dealt with dematerialisation requirements for public companies and promoters making public offers.

The regulatory journey toward comprehensive dematerialisation unfolded progressively through a series of amendments. On September 10, 2018, the MCA inserted Rule 9A through a notification that came into effect on October 2, 2018. This rule mandated every unlisted public company to issue securities only in dematerialised form and facilitate dematerialisation of all existing securities. Rule 9A marked the first significant expansion of mandatory dematerialisation beyond listed companies, bringing all unlisted public companies within the compliance net.

Rule 9A contained detailed provisions requiring unlisted public companies to obtain International Securities Identification Numbers (ISIN), facilitate dematerialisation through depositories, ensure that promoters, directors, and key managerial personnel hold securities in demat form before making any fresh issues, and prohibit transfer of physical securities. The rule also mandated the filing of Form PAS-6, a half-yearly return reporting securities held in dematerialised form.

Importantly, Rule 9A(11) provided specific exemptions for Nidhi companies, government companies, and wholly-owned subsidiaries of unlisted public companies. These exemptions reflected the government’s nuanced approach to balancing regulatory objectives with practical considerations for certain categories of companies.

The Landmark Notification: Introduction of Rule 9B

The regulatory landscape for private companies transformed fundamentally on October 27, 2023, when the Ministry of Corporate Affairs issued notification G.S.R. 802(E), introducing the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Second Amendment Rules, 2023. This notification inserted Rule 9B into the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, exercising powers conferred by Section 29 read with Section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Rule 9B represents a paradigm shift in Indian corporate law, mandating that every private company, other than a small company and government company, must issue securities only in dematerialised form and facilitate dematerialisation of all its securities in accordance with the Depositories Act, 1996.

Key Provisions of Rule 9B:

Rule 9B(1) establishes the core obligation: every private company, other than a small company, shall within the period referred to in sub-rule (2):

  • Issue securities only in dematerialised form, and
  • Facilitate dematerialisation of all its securities in accordance with the Depositories Act, 1996 and regulations made thereunder

Rule 9B(2) prescribes the compliance timeline: a private company which, as on the last day of a financial year ending on or after March 31, 2023, is not a small company as per audited financial statements for such financial year, shall comply with Rule 9B within eighteen months from the closure of such financial year.

This means that private companies that were not small companies as of March 31, 2023, were initially required to comply by September 30, 2024. For companies that ceased to be small companies during the financial year 2023-24, the eighteen-month compliance period would begin from March 31, 2024, extending their deadline to September 30, 2025.

Rule 9B(3) incorporates by reference several compliance requirements from Rule 9A, including:

  • Obtaining ISIN through a Registrar and Transfer Agent
  • Ensuring that promoters, directors, and key managerial personnel hold securities exclusively in dematerialised form before making any offer for issuance or buyback
  • Filing Form PAS-6 half-yearly with the Registrar of Companies
  • Bringing to the notice of depositories any difference in issued capital and capital held in dematerialised form
  • Compliance with grievance redressal mechanisms through the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (IEPFA)

Significantly, unlike Rule 9A, Rule 9B does not provide exemptions for wholly-owned subsidiaries. This means that a wholly-owned subsidiary of a private company, if not a small company, must comply with dematerialisation requirements regardless of its subsidiary status.

Extension of Compliance Deadline: February 2025 Notification

Recognizing the practical challenges faced by private companies in implementing dematerialisation within the original timeline, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs issued another critical notification on February 12, 2025. This notification amended Rule 9B(2), extending the compliance deadline from the financial year ending March 31, 2023, to June 30, 2025.

This extension provides significant relief, particularly for companies that were struggling to complete the complex process of obtaining ISINs, coordinating with depositories, appointing Registrar and Transfer Agents, and communicating with shareholders. The new deadline of June 30, 2025, gives companies additional time to establish the necessary infrastructure and complete the transition to electronic securities.

The extension applies to all private companies (other than small companies and producer companies) and represents a pragmatic acknowledgment by the regulator that the dematerialisation process, while technologically straightforward, involves substantial coordination among multiple stakeholders including the company, shareholders, depositories, depository participants, and registrars.

Applicability and Exemptions:

Understanding which companies must comply with Rule 9B is critical for proper implementation. The rule applies to all private companies except:

Small Companies: As defined under Section 2(85) of the Companies Act, 2013, a small company is one (other than a public company) having:

  • Paid-up share capital not exceeding Rs. 4 crores, AND
  • Turnover not exceeding Rs. 40 crores

The determination of whether a company qualifies as a small company must be made as on the last day of a financial year based on the audited financial statements for that year. Importantly, if a company ceases to be a small company in any subsequent financial year, it must comply with dematerialisation requirements within eighteen months from the close of that financial year.

Government Companies: Companies in which not less than fifty-one percent of the paid-up share capital is held by the Central Government, or by any State Government or Governments, or partly by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments, are exempt from Rule 9B.

Producer Companies: While initially subject to the same deadlines, producer companies have been granted an extended compliance deadline until March 31, 2028, recognizing their unique cooperative structure and operational challenges.

Notably, companies incorporated under Section 8 of the Companies Act (companies with charitable objects) are NOT exempt from Rule 9B if they meet the criteria of a private company that is not a small company. Similarly, wholly-owned subsidiaries of private companies must comply if they do not qualify as small companies, unlike the exemption available to wholly-owned subsidiaries of unlisted public companies under Rule 9A.

Operational Requirements and Restrictions Under Rule 9B

The compliance obligations under Rule 9B extend beyond merely facilitating dematerialisation. Private companies must navigate several operational requirements and restrictions:

Issuance of Securities: After the applicable compliance deadline, companies can issue securities only in dematerialised form. Any attempt to issue physical certificates would constitute a violation of Rule 9B.

Transfer of Securities: Shareholders cannot transfer securities in physical form on or after the compliance deadline. Securities held in physical form must first be dematerialised before any transfer can be executed. This restriction fundamentally alters the transfer process for private companies that traditionally relied on physical share transfer deeds.

Subscription to Fresh Issues: Any holder of securities wishing to subscribe to any securities of the company (whether through private placement, bonus shares, or rights offer) must first dematerialize all their existing securities. This requirement ensures that the company’s capital structure progressively moves toward complete dematerialisation.

Holdings of Promoters, Directors, and KMPs: Before making any offer for issuance or buyback of securities on or after the compliance deadline, companies must ensure that the entire holding of securities by promoters, directors, and key managerial personnel is held exclusively in dematerialised form. This provision recognizes that company insiders should lead by example in adopting dematerialisation.

Filing of Form PAS-6: Companies must file Form PAS-6, a half-yearly return for reporting securities held in demat form, with the Registrar of Companies within sixty days from the conclusion of each half-year. For the half-year from April to September, the due date is November 29, and for October to March, the due date is May 30. This form must be certified by a company secretary in practice or chartered accountant in practice.

Maintenance of Registers: Interestingly, under Section 88(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, the register and index of beneficial owners maintained by a depository under Section 11 of the Depositories Act, 1996, is deemed to be the corresponding register and index for the purposes of the Companies Act. This means companies need not maintain a separate register of members for securities held in dematerialised form.

Reconciliation and Discrepancies: Companies must immediately bring to the notice of the depositories any difference observed between their issued capital and the capital held in dematerialised form. This requirement ensures continuous monitoring and prompt resolution of any discrepancies.

The Dematerialisation Process: A Step-by-Step Journey

For private companies implementing dematerialisation, understanding the comprehensive process is essential. The journey involves coordination among multiple stakeholders and careful adherence to regulatory requirements:

Step 1: Board Resolution – The company must first pass a board resolution authorizing dematerialisation of securities and empowering directors to execute necessary agreements with depositories and appoint a Registrar and Transfer Agent.

Step 2: Appointment of Registrar and Transfer Agent (RTA) – While not legally mandatory if the company has in-house arrangements, most companies find it practical to appoint an RTA. The RTA acts as an intermediary between the company, depositories, and investors, handling verification of dematerialisation requests, maintaining records, and facilitating corporate actions.

Step 3: Application to Depository – The company must approach either NSDL (National Securities Depository Limited) or CDSL (Central Depository Services Limited) and execute an agreement. This agreement sets out the terms of dematerialisation services and the respective responsibilities of parties.

Step 4: Obtaining ISIN – Through the RTA or directly, the company must obtain an International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) for each class of securities. The ISIN serves as a unique identifier for the company’s securities in the electronic system.

Step 5: Communication to Shareholders – The company must notify all existing security holders about the facility for dematerialisation, explaining the process and benefits. This communication should include details about opening demat accounts and submitting dematerialisation requests.

Step 6: Shareholder Action – Shareholders must open demat accounts with any Depository Participant (DP) of their choice. DPs are entities authorized by depositories to provide demat services—typically banks, financial institutions, and brokers.

Step 7: Submission of Dematerialisation Request – Shareholders submit a Dematerialisation Request Form (DRF) along with their physical share certificates to their DP. The certificates must be defaced by marking them “Surrendered for Dematerialisation.”

Step 8: Verification and Processing – The DP forwards the request to the company or its RTA for verification. The company verifies the authenticity of certificates and the shareholder’s details against its records.

Step 9: Confirmation and Credit – Upon successful verification, the company confirms the dematerialisation request. The depository then credits the equivalent number of securities to the shareholder’s demat account, and the physical certificates are destroyed.

Step 10: Ongoing Compliance – The company must maintain ongoing compliance by filing Form PAS-6 half-yearly, monitoring any discrepancies between issued capital and dematerialised holdings, and ensuring all new issuances and transfers occur only in demat form. accompany last-minute regulatory deadlines, and they signal to stakeholders – including potential investors, employees, and business partners – that they embrace modern governance practices.

Conclusion:

Dematerialisation of securities represents more than a regulatory compliance exercise; it embodies a fundamental shift toward more efficient, transparent, and secure capital management. For private limited companies, while the choice remains largely voluntary under current law, the practical benefits and strategic advantages merit serious consideration.

The consequences of non-compliance matter primarily for companies under mandatory dematerialisation requirements, where regulatory penalties and operational disruptions can be severe. For other private companies, the “consequences” of not dematerialising are more subtle but nonetheless significant – missed opportunities for efficiency, increased administrative burden, and potential barriers to future growth.

As with many aspects of corporate governance, the wisest approach is proactive rather than reactive. Private companies that thoughtfully evaluate their circumstances, consider their growth trajectory, and make informed decisions about dematerialisation – rather than simply defaulting to the status quo—will find themselves better positioned for success in an increasingly digital business landscape.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Companies should consult with qualified legal and financial advisors before making decisions regarding dematerialisation of securities.

Author Bio

A qualified legal and finance professional with expertise in corporate law, insolvency law, customs law, taxation law (Direct and Indirect), FEMA and international trade. Actively involved in writ matters before the High Court, dealing with constitutional, administrative, labour, taxation, and regul View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Filing Petitions Before NCLT & NCLAT in Corporate Insolvency Matters: A Practitioner’s Guide Assessment under Section 65 of CGST Act: Legal Overview Fast Track Insolvency Resolution: Streamlining Corporate Insolvency Analysis of Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) under IBC Cross-Border Insolvency in India & Recent Judicial pronouncements View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728