Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Explore the tax implications for IPL players, including income tax for Indian and overseas players, TDS rates, and the role of DTA...
Income Tax : Explore the taxation framework for startups in India, including tax holidays, ESOPs, and angel tax exemptions under the Income Tax...
Income Tax : New Application for Condonation of Delay in Filing Forms 9A, 10, 10B, and 10BB Post 18th November 2024 as per Circular No. 16/2024...
Income Tax : India-Switzerland MFN clause suspension may cost $100 billion in Swiss investment, raising tax rates on dividends and impacting th...
Income Tax : SC clarifies reassessment notices under TOLA and Finance Act 2021 in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. Learn how decision impacts t...
Income Tax : Government decriminalizes minor direct tax offences, simplifies compliance, and improves litigation management. Key changes includ...
Income Tax : PAN 2.0 focuses on process upgrades for taxpayers with no mandatory new PAN card. Existing cards remain valid. Estimated cost: ₹...
Income Tax : CBDT's electronic campaign helps taxpayers fix mismatches in income and transactions for FY 2023-24 and 2021-22. Revised ITRs can ...
Income Tax : KSCAA raises concerns and provides suggestions for improving the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 to the CBDT....
Income Tax : The government responds to queries on corporate tax, including notices, prosecutions, and collections over the past five years....
Income Tax : Assessee had given reasons that as per the previous counsel, late Shri R.R. Jain (C.A.) had given advice no separate appeal agains...
Income Tax : The stand of the assessee was that it was not necessary that loss of one industrial undertaking should necessarily be adjusted aga...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition of entire amount as unaccounted sales not justified since undisclosed income is required to be c...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai dismisses the appeal of Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for AY 2017-...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai rules on ACIT vs Rohit Krishna, dismissing penalties under Section 43 of the Black Money Act for non-reporting of fore...
Income Tax : Circular No. 19/2024 offers clarifications on the eligibility and settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024....
Income Tax : CBDT amends Notification No. 44/2020 under Section 10(23FE) of Income-tax Act. Changes take effect from publication in the Officia...
Income Tax : Notification designates special courts in Tamil Nadu under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and Black Money Act, 2015, for specific distr...
Income Tax : The Ministry of Finance grants approval to IIIT Hyderabad for scientific research under the Income Tax Act, effective from 2024-25...
Income Tax : Overview of steps in the ITBA Assessment Module for passing assessment orders, including income computation, feedback, and order g...
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (iii) of clause (44) of section 2 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby authorises every Gazetted Officer of the Government of West Bengal appointed to perform the functions of a Certificate-Officer under clause (3) of section 3 of the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913 (Bengal Act III of 1913), to exercise the powers of a Tax Recovery Officer under the Income-tax Act, 1961
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (iv) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies Bharatiya Bhasha Parishad, Calcutta, for the purpose of the said sub-clause for the assessment years 1990-91 to 1992-93 subject to the following conditions, namely
It is hereby notified for general information that the institution mentioned below has been approved by the Secretary, Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi, the prescribed authority for the purposes of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with rule 6(iv) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, under the category of “Association” in the area of other natural and applied sciences, subject to the following conditions :—
In a civil suit the respondent obtained a decree against his employer the appellant company for a sum which included com- pensation for wrongful termination of his service, arrears of salary, interest and costs of the suit, and then applied for execution of the decree.
Y. Narayana Chetty Vs. ITO (Supreme Court) The notice prescribed by section 148 cannot be regarded as a mere procedural requirement. It is only if the said notice is served on the assessee that the ITO would be justified in taking proceedings against the assessee. If no notice is issued or if the notice issued is shown to be invalid, then the proceedings taken by the ITO would be illegal and void – Y. Narayana Chetty v. ITO [1959] 35 ITR 388 (SC); CIT v. Thayaballi Mulla Jeevaji Kapasi [1967] 66 ITR 147 (SC); CIT v. Kurban Hussain Ibrahimji Mithiborwala [1971] 82 ITR 821 (SC).
Held, that the Income-tax Officer was justified in exercising his powers under s. 35 and rectifying the mistake. As a result of, the legal fiction about the retrospective operation of the Amendment Act, the subsequently inserted proviso must be read as.
The question arising for consideration both in the reference under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act as well as in W.P. No. 925 of 1955 are identical and relate to the proper rule to be applied for determining the amortisation of films for computing the income, profits and gains of the assessee which is carrying on business as a film distributor. The assessee in the Reference Case No. 27 of 1955 is the petitioner in the writ petition.
In pursuance of the direction of this Court under Section 66(2), Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, in Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 143 of 1950, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay, has submitted the statement of case on the following question of law : “Whether on the material on record the Appellate Tribunal could reasonably come to a finding that the sum of Rs. 8,500 was an income undisclosed sources ?”
An assessment under section 23(3) of the Act cannot be made only on bare suspcion. An assessment so made without disclosing to the assessee the information supplied by the departmental representative and without giving any opportunity to the assessee to rebut the information so supplied and declining to take into consideration all materials which the assesses wanted to produce in support of his case constitutes a violation of the fundamental rules of justice and calls for the powers under Art. 136 of the Constitution.
CIT v. S Sen & Others (Orissa High Court) 17 ITR 355 (Orissa) The proceeding arises out of two application consolidated because of the facts being identical, by the Commissioner of Income-tax/Excess profits Tax, Bihar and Orissa, under Section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act read with Section 21 of the Excess profits tax Act for the stating a case and a case stated for the opinion of this Court on the following three question of law :-
