Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Explore the differences between Form 16 and Form 16A, their purposes, eligibility, and significance in income tax filing. Understa...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court’s Rajeev Bansal case clarified the validity of reassessment notices for AY 2013-14 to 2018-19 and introduced t...
Income Tax : Learn about the planned overhaul of India’s Income Tax Act 1961, set to simplify and modernize tax laws by 2025, aiming for clar...
Income Tax : Learn how to revise TDS returns online via TRACES, correct errors, and ensure compliance. Get step-by-step guidance and understand...
Income Tax : In the alternate, assessee has also raised a ground that Assessing Officer ought to have allowed the expenditure incurred in culti...
Income Tax : Learn how CRS and FATCA enhance tax transparency, requiring foreign asset disclosure in India. Avoid penalties with complete, accu...
Income Tax : Direct tax collections for FY 2024-25 have risen 21.2% gross, with a 15.41% net growth compared to the previous year, reflecting c...
Income Tax : CBI files chargesheet against Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and four others in a Rs 10 lakh bribery case. Investigation det...
Income Tax : CBDT sets transfer pricing tolerance range at 1% for wholesale trading and 3% for other transactions for AY 2024-25, providing cla...
Income Tax : KSCAA highlights critical issues on India’s Income Tax Portal, impacting timely filings for returns and TDS with glitches, timeo...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur upheld CIT(A)'s decision to add undisclosed income under Sec 50C in the case of Kavita Samtani Vs DCIT, relating to di...
Income Tax : As per provisions of section 153C of the Act, notice required to be issued to the other person would be a notice under section 153...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur rules in favor of Deepak Kumar Samtani, dismissing penalty under Section 272A(1)(C) due to lack of evidence of non-com...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that CIT(A) erred in upholding addition made by AO without considering the additional evidence. Such failure t...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that the addition made under section 69A of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained money is liable to be quashed ...
Income Tax : CBDT grants tax exemption to the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board for AY 2024-25 under Section 10(46A) of the Income Tax...
Income Tax : CBDT sets new monetary limits for waiver of interest on delayed tax payments under Section 220(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, eff...
Income Tax : CBDT issues Notification No. 5/2024 for mandatory electronic filing of Forms 3CEDA and 3C-O under Income Tax Rules, effective from...
Income Tax : CBDT issues Circular No. 14/2024 allowing condonation of delay in filing tax returns for AY 2023-24 under Section 80P, benefiting ...
Income Tax : The CBDT extends the Income Tax Return due date for AY 2024-25 to November 15, 2024, as per Circular No. 13/2024 issued on October...
In our opinion, the assessee himself having taken these two non-related parties as comparables in its TP study, it cannot now turn back and say that one of the parties is not comparable without giving any cogent or convincing reason. The only reason given by the assessee in this regard is that the use of technology availed from Dupont has restricted application. It is, however, observed from the relevant figures that the domestic sales generated by the assessee using the technology of Dupont is quite comparable with the domestic sales generated from the use of technology of its AE Kansai Japan. There is thus no merit in the stand of the assessee that Depont is not a comparable case with Kansai Japan.
The hon’ble Ahmedabad Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Well Pack Packaging v. Deputy CIT reported at [2003] 78 TTJ (Ahd) 448 has held that revaluation of depreciable assets and conversion of a partnership firm into company does not lead to incidence of capital gain inasmuch as revaluation is made in the hands of the assessee by writing up the value of assets in the books. In view of the provisions of sections 575, 576 and 577 of the Companies Act, 1956, there is no transfer involved when a company got itself registered under Part IX of the Companies Act. In view of this, there is no question of applicability of the provision of section 45 or 50 or any other provisions of the Income-tax Act arise on conversion of a firm into company.
From the fact that the income of the society comprised of receipts from the activity of letting out a kalyana mantapa owned by it on rent, fees received from the members on sale of liquor in the bar run by the assesse, it does not follow that the activities of the Assessee are not genuine or that the activities are not being carried out in accordance with the objects of the Assessee.
The other point considered by the authorities below marring the benefit u/s 72A(1) is that the assessee company failed to lead evidence that the amalgamation was to ensure the revival of the business of the amalgamating company. Objections of the AO in points nos. (iii) and (iv) of para 3 of this order about the violation of the conditions prescribed in Rule 9C are also related to this very aspect of the matter. The case of the AO is that the assessee failed to substantiate the steps taken by it to revive business of BTPU and further it did not satisfy the twin conditions as per rule 9C, being, achieving the stipulated level of production of at least fifty percent of the installed capacity of BTPU and furnishing certificate in Form no. 62.
Update of TAN registration details is allowed on successful logging to TAN account. For updating the TAN registration details click on “Update Profile”. Under ‘update profile’ user can update demographic and contact details including e-mail ID (s) On successful update of TAN registration details, an alert e-mail is sent intimating updates have been successfully processed […]
After considering the rival submissions and perusing the relevant material on record it is observed that the due date for filing the return of income by the assessee under section 139(1) for the relevant year is 30.11.2006. The AO has drawn a chart at page-4 of the assessment order showing the dates of actual deposits and due dates for the said contributions of EPF and ESIC.
A perusal of the assessment order clearly shows that Smt. Madhumita Paul, had been summoned under section 131 of the Act and her statements have been recorded. It is shown in the statements recorded that Smt. Madhumita Paul did do work at the business premises of the assessee firm.
Assessee, in fact, was enjoying possession of the impugned property and for peaceful vacation thereof it had received the impugned amount which was described by both parties as amount paid for surrender of tenancy rights. The assessee had acquired the said right long back and the licensor to the assessee also had recognised the said right of the assessee.
In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the demolition of the building took place at the behest of the assessee and it is not an act of God in which event, it has to be said that demolition of house would fall within the definition of ‘transfer’. This aspect was not properly analysed by the ITAT in the case of co-owner since the subsequent decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Grace Collis (supra) was not brought to the notice of the Co-ordinate Bench. Since this aspect was not looked into by learned CIT(A), we deem it fair and reasonable to set aside the matter to the file of learned CIT(A) who is directed to reconsider the matter in accordance with law in the light of our above observations.
The Finance Bill, 2013 has proposed to amend the definition of agricultural land. Here is an attempt to analyse the impact of such changes from a capital gains tax perspective. Any profit arising from sale of a capital asset would be chargeable to income tax under the head ‘capital gains’ and shall be deemed to be the income of the year in which the transfer took place.
