Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Learn about the clubbing provisions under the Income Tax Act, covering income transfers, revocable transfers, and taxation of inco...
Income Tax : Understand the provisions of Sections 269SS, 269ST, and 269T under Indian tax law, their implications, and reporting requirements ...
Income Tax : Learn about Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs), including eligibility, investment limits, interest rates, redemption, and tax implication...
Income Tax : Rental income from sub-letting is taxed as "Income from other sources," not "Income from house property." Deemed ownership rules a...
Income Tax : Understand presumptive taxation schemes under sections 44AD, 44ADA, and 44AE, including eligibility, computation, and maintenance ...
Income Tax : Join our 5-day live course from Sept 8-12, 2024, for an in-depth understanding of tax audits under Section 44AB, with practical in...
Income Tax : Learn to handle faceless income tax assessments using AI tools like ChatGPT in a 2-hour live course on Sept 1, 2024. Enhance effic...
Income Tax : The Central Action Plan 2024-2025 by CBDT aims to optimize India's direct tax system, focusing on revenue, litigation, taxpayer se...
Income Tax : Join our live course from Aug 23-25, 2024, to master tax audits, including Form 3CD, financial statements, and GST, with practical...
Income Tax : As of August 11, 2024, net direct tax collections for FY 2024-25 stand at Rs. 6.93 lakh crores, marking a 22.48% growth compared t...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deletes disallowance of capital gains by DCIT after confirming investment in property with Charity Commissioner approv...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that confirmation of addition u/s. 69A and 68 of the Income Tax Act without finding any fault with the evidence s...
Income Tax : Madras High Court held that compensation paid to ESOP holders qualifies as perquisite and hence taxable under the head ‘salary�...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that invocation of section 263 by PCIT unjustified due lack of sufficient evidence to support claim that the o...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act towards Long Term Capital Gains admissible even when ret...
Income Tax : Finance Act 2023 updates the process for filing applications under Section 10(46A) of the Income-tax Act. Standardized procedures ...
Income Tax : On August 16, 2024, President Droupadi Murmu officially granted her assent to the Finance (No 2) Bill, 2024. With this move, the b...
Income Tax : Explore the Finance Bill 2024, detailing income tax rates, surcharges, and provisions for various taxpayers, including individuals...
Income Tax : Insight Instruction No. 79 details procedures for managing high-risk PAN cases in the Insight portal, guiding tax officers through...
Income Tax : UIDAI's specified income receives tax exemption for AY 2024-2025 to 2028-2029 under Income-tax Act, 1961, as per the latest CBDT n...
Shri Pankaj Surana Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) As per Section 57(iii) of the Act, any expenditure not being in the nature of a capital expenditure, laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purpose of making or earning income under the head ‘income from other sources’ is to be allowed as a deduction. As […]
Rajesh Kumar Malhotra Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) This Court is of the view that the Petitioner has not been provided an adequate opportunity to put forward its defense/reply as the annexure accompanying the notice enumerating the reasons for initiating reassessment pertained to the Assessment Year 2015-16 and not 2018-19. It is pertinent to mention […]
Vishnu Kumar Sinha (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur) In this case CIT(Appeals) had disposed off the appeal for non-prosecution and had failed to apply his mind to the issue which did arise from the impugned order and has been assailed by the assessee before him. We are unable to persuade ourselves to accept the manner […]
Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) It is not disputed by both the parties that there is no finding in the assessment order for levy of penalty for the alleged default u/s. 271B of the Act and it is also not disputed that after passing of the order on 31.12.2011, the alleged […]
Clean Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (A) (ITAT Pune) The issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. On perusal of the penalty order as well as the assessment order, it would reveal that the penalty was levied for furnishing the inaccurate particulars of income […]
CIT (A) has erred in facts and law in holding that loss from sale of shares was short-term capital losses and hence not eligible for set of against income from profession of assessee.
We noted that the turnover has increased more than double and consequently expenses have increased little more than doubt on both counts i.e., salary as well as EB charges. We noted that the AO has made estimated disallowance on the basis that the assessee has not furnished any separate documents like details of staff or details of electricity bills.
Poonawalla Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) The only issue pressed is about restricting the addition under Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 by considering only such investments which yielded tax free dividend income. Hon’ble Delhi High Court in ACB India Ltd. vs. CIT (2015) 374 ITR 108 (Del) has held that the […]
HC held that despite lapse of four years and a scrutiny assessment, there is fresh tangible material in the present case in the form of information of beneficiaries of bogus LTCL/STCL report prepared by the office of Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) which reveals that Mahanivesh (India) Ltd. is a penny stock whose share price was manipulated in trade by way of a complex web of pre-arranged or artificial transactions to book long term/short term capital gain/loss to the beneficiaries.
The only fault of the assessee was of claiming Tax deducted at source wrongly. The learned Assessing Officer should have refused the credit of such TDS but should not have taxed interest income in the hands of the assessee. Therefore, even on the merits the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied.
