Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Article examines persistent exam paper leaks, their causes, impact on students, and suggests technology, stricter enforcement, eth...
Corporate Law : Explains how email exchanges may contribute to contracts under Indian law, covering the Indian Contract Act, IT Act, 2000, and Bha...
Corporate Law : Article analyses the IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026, covering creditor-driven reforms, CIIRP, liquidation, avoidance actions and cross-...
Corporate Law : A detailed guide to LLP incorporation covering RUN-LLP, Form FILLIP, Form LLP-3, required documents, CRC approval and post-incorpo...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC quashed demolition proceedings, adopted Supreme Court directions, and issued further directions governing demolition ...
Corporate Law : Government outlines FTAs, Export Promotion Mission, e-commerce export reforms and logistics initiatives to diversify export market...
Corporate Law : Finance Ministry states ED is investigating under PMLA, has attached ₹68.09 crore in properties and shared information with Biha...
Corporate Law : Finance Ministry outlines CBDT e-Filing portal upgrades, peak filing readiness and contractual penalties imposed on the Managed Se...
Corporate Law : CCPA begins action against 41 restaurants over default service charges, citing consumer complaints, 2022 Guidelines and the Consum...
Corporate Law : CBI filed its 16th chargesheet in a homebuyers fraud investigation alleging conspiracy, cheating and criminal breach of trust invo...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC upheld 7th CPC benefits and arrears for teachers of a private recognised school, holding the writ maintainable and the cl...
Corporate Law : SC held that a writ challenging termination by a private unaided minority school was not maintainable where the dispute arose from...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC upheld FIR registration under IPC for a pre-1 July 2024 offence, clarified BNSS investigation procedure, and disposed...
Corporate Law : SC enhanced maintenance to ₹25,000 per month under Section 144 BNSS, holding loan repayments should not substantially reduce mai...
Corporate Law : Punjab and Haryana HC dismissed a plea for perjury proceedings, holding it was not expedient in the interest of justice to initiat...
Corporate Law : Bill introduced in Lok Sabha proposes increasing Supreme Court Judges from 33 to 37, replacing the 2026 Ordinance with retrospecti...
Corporate Law : BCI directs State Bar Councils and law colleges to immediately implement its Circular on social media conduct, digital ethics and ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an Insolvency Professional's registration over CIRP compliance lapses, disclosure failures and Code violations in t...
Corporate Law : FSSAI amends the notified food laboratory list, updating accredited laboratories, registrations and scopes across multiple States ...
Corporate Law : PFRDA notifies Regulatory Sandbox Regulations, 2026 enabling controlled testing with limited relaxations while protecting subscrib...
Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Haryana (Supreme Court) Facts- By an earlier order dated 15.5.2009 [reported in Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Haryana & Anr. 2009 (7) SCC 363], we had referred to the ill – effects of what is known as General Power of Attorney Sales […]
The rule of contra proferentem thus protects the insured from the vagaries of an unfavourable interpretation of an ambiguous term to which it did not agree.
Ashvinkumar Ramniklal Jani Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) Apex Court in the case of Gangahanume Gowda Vs. Karnataka Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. reported in (2003) 3 SCC 40 has decided the interest on delayed payment of gratuity. It is also held that the same is mandatory and not discretionary. When it is not […]
Indranil Mukherjee Vs State of West Bengal And Others (Calcutta High Court) The Calcutta High Court held that in case of death of an accused the compensation awarded under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be recovered from the estate of a deceased accused, but an interim compensation awarded under Section 143A of […]
Asset Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. Vs Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (Supreme Court of India) The High Court overlooked the fact that there was no independent instrument of PoA and that in any case, the power of sale of a secured asset flowed out of the provisions of the Securitisation Act, 2002 and not out of […]
Debts Recovery Tribunals (DRTs), in some recent cases, have dismissed certain Securitisation Applications (SAs) on a peculiar ground of prematurity- ‘no loss of possession of the secured asset’. In the opinion of these DRTs, where neither the symbolic nor the actual physical possession of the immovable property/secured asset was taken by the secured creditor, but only intimation notices to take physical possession of such property were issued by the court receiver appointed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the SAs challenging such intimation notices were premature.
Invent Asset Securitisation And Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Girnar Fibres Ltd (Supreme Court of India) Time and again, it has been expressed and explained by this Court that the provisions of the Code are essentially intended to bring the corporate debtor to its feet and are not of money recovery proceedings as such. The intent […]
NCLAT Delhi dismisses appeal, upholding the jurisdiction of NCLT, Principal Bench at New Delhi, in admitting Section 7 Application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Ravi alias Rabbu son of Radhey Shyam Vs State of Haryana (Punjab & Haryana High Court) Even though there would be no dispute with respect to the proposition of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court and relied upon by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that a birth certificate issued by […]
Resolution Professional’s job is confined to making recommendations; there is no aspect of adjudication on the Resolution Professional’s behalf. The final decision on whether the application should be accepted or rejected is made by the Adjudicating Authority, which is not bound by the Resolution Professional’s advice.
