Gujarat High Court rules ITAT erred in distinguishing staff loan interest, mandating adherence to binding precedents and remanding the case for rectification.
The Gujarat High Court dismissed most of the Revenue’s appeal against Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., clarifying Section 14A, capital grants, and interest income taxation.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules that commission deducted in export invoices is a trade discount, not a service subject to tax under reverse charge, benefiting exporters.
ITAT Mumbai rules on Section 36(1)(viia) deduction for banks, confirming it applies to total outstanding advances, including opening balances, citing High Court precedents.
Madras High Court affirms reassessment in A. Sridevi case, citing failure of full disclosure and rejecting ‘change of opinion’ argument.
Meghavi Minerals Pvt Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) Gujarat High Court has upheld the Income Tax Officer’s (ITO) decision to reopen the assessment of Meghavi Minerals Pvt. Ltd. for the assessment year 2012-13. The court rejected the company’s challenge to the Section 148 notice of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which initiated reassessment proceedings based […]
Madras High Court upholds reassessment against Empee Holdings, affirming factual findings on interest-free loans to group companies and disallowing set-off.
Mumbai ITAT clarifies Section 54F capital gains exemption, ruling that co-ownership does not disqualify an assessee from claiming tax benefits on new residential property.
The ITAT Delhi addressed cross-appeals in Amit Gupta vs. ACIT, ruling on Section 54B deduction based on extended return filing dates and clarifying Section 54F exemption for jointly owned property.
ITAT Jaipur clarifies Section 54F, ruling that booking a flat doesn’t equal ownership for exemption conditions. A key verdict on capital gains tax relief.
