Covers complete TDS and TCS compliance under GST including new metal scrap rules. Provides step-by-step guidance for businesses and professionals.
The law permits refund of input tax credit on exports due to their zero-rated nature. The discussion clarifies refund mechanisms and highlights conditions for eligibility. It underscores that errors in documentation can lead to denial of refunds.
The guide clarifies when GST liability shifts to the recipient under RCM for GTA and renting services. The key takeaway is that correct classification and notification-based conditions determine tax liability.
GST may appear simplified, but HSN classification remains central to compliance and disputes. Incorrect classification can lead to penalties and scrutiny.
GST provides a structured ladder of assessment mechanisms based on compliance and risk. Understanding each stage helps taxpayers avoid disputes and manage liability effectively.
Courts have clarified that Section 79 of the GST law is a recovery mechanism that can be invoked only after tax liability is adjudicated or self-assessed and remains unpaid.
GST authorities often cancel registrations retrospectively after detecting fake entities, leading to ITC denial for genuine buyers. Courts have ruled that ITC cannot be denied solely on retrospective cancellation without proving bogus transactions.
The law treats orders as communicated when served through any valid mode under Section 169, including e-mail, portal upload, or service on an advocate. Once proper service is proved, courts strictly enforce the 120-day limitation for filing GST appeals.
GST law allows appeals within three months with a maximum condonation of one additional month. Courts have largely held that delays beyond 120 days cannot be condoned except in rare circumstances.
The article examines how Section 64 of the CGST Act is increasingly used against genuine recipients in ITC disputes. It argues that summary assessment powers meant for emergencies are being misapplied to fast-track tax demands.
