In re Informage Realty Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) 1. Whether GST will be applicable on the booking/selling of plots to be done by The Applicant and Land owners during the development (before completion of the development work of the township) of the township? If GST is applicable then what will be the taxable value […]
In re Varun Beverages Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) How to transfer the portion of input tax credit as belonging to Sandila unit (covered by the infrastructure & industrial investment policy 2012 of the State of Uttar Pradesh for claiming refund of UP GST component paid in cash in the prescribed percentage of policy), lying […]
In re Bitcom Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) a) What is the correct classification HSN code based luminaire in passenger coaches of Indian Railways which exclusively works on electric supply of 110/127 Volts? Ans. Correct classification of luminaire in passenger coaches of Indian Railways which exclusively works on electric supply of 110/127 Volts […]
PCIT (Exemptions) Vs Green Wood High School (Karnataka High Court) Income derived from the trust property has also got to be computed on commercial principles and if commercial principles are applied, then adjustment of expenses incurred by the trust for charitable and religious purposes in the earlier years against the income earned by the trust […]
A. Ramalingam Vs Income Tax officer (ITAT Chennai) The exemption claimed by the assessee under CBDT circular is only for seizure of gold jewellery during the course of search operation. As rightly submitted by the Ld. Departmental Representative, it does not absolve the assessee from explaining the source for acquisition of such jewellery. Therefore, the […]
Mittal International Vs CCE (CESTAT Chandigarh) Refund claim was denied on the ground that the said goods have been exported and drawback is allowed on the export of goods. The case of the Revenue is that as the appellants have claimed drawback on export of the goods, therefore, they are not entitled for refund claim […]
Dr. S. Muthian Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) Sec.143(3) of the Act contemplates two methods of assessment being made vis-a -vis a return filed by an assessee. Wherever, the AO wants to scrutinise the return of income, he has to issue notice u/s.143(2) of the Act so as to complete the assessment u/s.143(3) of the Act. […]
Medravathi Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) It is observed that the assessee company as well as other thirteen land owning companies were incorporated with their main object to carry on the agricultural activities and there is no dispute about the same. In order to pursue this main objects, these companies purchased agricultural […]
ITAT Delhi ruling in Divya Devi vs. ACIT: Jewellery rebate as per CBDT’s Instruction No. 1916. Download full text of the order. Date: 16-05-2014.
Rajasthan High Court held that the CBDT had clearly provided that prescribed limit of jewellery will not be seized, it would mean that taxpayer, found with possession of such jewellery, will also not be questioned about its source and acquisition.
