This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Jewellery prescribed limit treated explained Revenue shows anything contrary
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Divya Devi Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Divya Devi Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
ITAT Delhi ruling in Divya Devi vs. ACIT: Jewellery rebate as per CBDT’s Instruction No. 1916. Download full text of the order. Date: 16-05-2014.
Jewellery upto prescribed limit must be treated as explained unless Revenue shows anything to contrary
Though it is true that the CBDT Instruction No. 1916, dt. 11th may, 1996 lays down guidelines for seizure of jewellery and ornaments. In the course of search, the same takes into account the quantity of jewellery which would generally be held by family members of an assessee belonging to an ordinary Hindu househ...
