Court is persuaded to accept the view that the goods and vehicle detained pursuant to Ext.P7 order could be released to the petitioner on the basis of simple bond and it need not be insisted that the petitioner will have to furnish a bank guarantee for the amounts demanded in Ext.P7 order.
M.R. Traders Vs Assistant State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court) Address shown in the invoice is different from the address shown in the E Way bill etc. is only a clerical mistake and is not a serious mistake which should justify the detention and penalty proceedings. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGEMENT […]
In this case challenge was made to notice issued by superintendent on account of delayed filing of return whereby interest on gross amount was computed under Section 50 of CGST Act, 2017. Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court dismissed the writ petition as petitioner has failed to convince why the writ is Maintainable.
Role of the applicant No.1 is coming out in generating of fake and fabricated documents availed or to make other availed and illegal input tax credit causing huge loss to the revenue.
1. The activity of electroplating undertaken by the applicant is ‘Supply of service’ and is classifiable under Heading ‘9988- Manufacturing services on Physical Inputs owned by others’.
In re Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Tamilnadu) 1. Whether the Transitional Provisions under Section 142(11)(c), (Chapter XX) of TNGST Act, 2017/CGST Act, 2017 is correctly applicable for the remaining installments of “Mobilization Advance’, which transitioned into the GST regime and to be adjusted/deducted by the applicant post the implementation of GST […]
Income Tax needs to be deducted at source by the purchaser on payment against purchase of an immovable property from a non-resident following the guideline as below: 1. Who is a non-resident under Income Tax Act? Ans. The residential Status is determined for every financial year, i.e., the period from 1st April to 31st March […]
Assesssee did not furnish PAN and Bank statements or any of the directors of investor companies merely showing that transactions were carried out through banking channel was not sufficient to prove genuineness of transaction in the matter. When investors having nil income had deposited cash in their bank account immediately before giving cheque to assessee. The same were bogus entries received by assessee in the name of sale of shares and addition was rightly made by AO under section 68.
Prospective accused has no right of hearing before registration of FIR and investigation by the police officer or before the Court including the writ Court, therefore, in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into a cognizable offence, the prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party.
CBIC Seeks to impose provisional anti-dumping duty on the imports of the Digital offset printing plates, originating in or exported from China PR, Japan, Korea RP, Taiwan and Vietnam vide Notification No. 2/2020-Customs (ADD) dated 30th January, 2020. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) Notification No. 2/2020-Customs (ADD) New Delhi, the 30th January, 2020 G.S.R. […]
