Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhananjay Kumar Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)
Appeal Number : WPCR No. 121 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/01/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Dhananjay Kumar Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)

Prospective accused has no right of hearing before registration of FIR and investigation by the police officer or before the Court including the writ Court, therefore, in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into a cognizable offence, the prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT

1. The matter has been posted before the Full Bench for having an effective pronouncement on the following question formulated by the learned Single Judge (Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.) :

Whether in a writ petition preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation against the accused persons alleged to have committed the cognizable offence(s), the said accused persons are necessary or proper party and they are required to be noticed and heard before issuing any such writ/direction, if any ?

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031