Muhammed Shafi P. Vs NIA (Kerala High Court) Undisputed facts are as follows:NIA registered the above mentioned case alleging offences punishable under Sections 16, 17 and 18 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (“UA(P) Act”, in short). Accused persons were arrested by NIA on different dates and they have been confined to custody for […]
CBIC notifies Ambala (Haryana) Airport as Customs airports for specified Purpose vide Notification No. 24/2021-Customs (N.T.), Dated; 18.02.2021 which includes the following – (a) Unloading of – (i) baggage of defence personnel; (ii) imported goods related to Ministry of Defence. (b) Loading of – (i) baggage of defence personnel; (ii) export goods related to Ministry […]
Suraj Stones Corporation Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Without issuing summons under section 131 of the Act to a party who filed confirmation, no adverse inference can be drawn by the AO. It is clear from the orders of the revenue authorities that they not made any reference to the documentary evidence filed by the […]
We may mention that demat accounts of the petitioners have been frozen for non-payment of annual listing fee which has been quantified at Rs.14,16,000/- for the period from 2015-16 to 2019-20. Against the freezing of demat accounts, petitioners preferred appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal.
THE MAJOR PORT AUTHORITIES ACT, 2021 is An Act to provide for regulation, operation and planning of Major Ports in India and to vest the administration, control and management of such ports upon the Boards of Major Port Authorities and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
Presently, in terms of Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957 (SCRR), issuers with post issue market capital of at least Rs 4,000 crores or more, are required to offer to public at least 10% of its post issue market capital (‘Minimum Public Offer’ – MPO). Further, such issuers are also required to achieve a minimum public shareholding (MPS) of at least 25% within three years from the date of listing.
Asian Organo Industries Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (High Court Gujarat) The writ applicant claims that it is eligible for the IGST refund claim on the basis of the shipping bills i.e. on the export of goods. According to the writ applicant, the shipping bills filed by an exporter of the goods are deemed to […]
Amadeus IT challenges DCIT’s order on CRS income, PE, and attribution. Key issues include tax liability, PE determination, and expenditure disallowance.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Pvt. Limited Vs Ambuj A. Kasliwal & Ors (Supreme Court) The extracted portion indicates that the High Court has proceeded at a tangent while adverting to the aspect of recovery made towards the loan amount from the land acquisition compensation payable to respondent No.3. The conclusion appears to be that the receipt […]
K. R. Ananad Vs Commissioner of Central Goods And Services Tax (Delhi High Court) Petitioner submits that in this case order was passed by ignoring the mandate of Section 34 of the DVAT Act which prescribes limitation for completion of assessment and provides period of four years. In terms of the Section 34, the assessment […]
