Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for implementation of the provision of suspension of registrations under sub-rule (2A) of rule 21A of CGST Rules, 2017 –
The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
Ahmed Hassan Muhammed Vs Customs (High Court Of Delhi) The fact of the present case is that prosecution has mixed all the packets and thereafter, sent to FSL for examination, which is contrary to the procedure prescribed under the law. This Court is informed that the petitioner is a Somalian National resident and his Refugee […]
Commissioner was not justified in confirming the demand of service tax under the category of ‘works contract’ for the period post June 1, 2007 even if the levy of service tax was not exempted under Notifications, since, the show cause notice that demand it service tax under the three categories namely (i) commercial or industrial construction, (ii) construction of complex and (iii) management, maintenance or repair.
Del Small Ice Cream Manufacturers Welfare’s Association (Reg.) Vs Union Of India & Anr (High Court Of Delhi) Hon’ble High Court direct the GST Council to reconsider the exclusion of small scale manufactures of ice cream from the benefit of Section 10(1) of the Act, including on the aforesaid two parameters i.e. the components used […]
ACIT Vs. M/s GTM Builders & Promoters Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) As per accounting standards AS-7, the purchases and working progress have to be reconciled along with architect report. The AO has not rejected the books of accounts and accepted the book profits while making the addition. The Assessing Officer’s observation that none of the […]
If it is proved by the applicant accused that his health condition is not good then I do not intend to arrest the applicant accused subject to his cooperation in investigation on following points – i) If the applicant accused is ready to share all the credential of crypto wallet and relevant information. ii) If the applicant accused is ready to deposit Rs.1,25,32,691.00 (Liability of the applicant accused) to the Hon’ble Court. iii) If the applicant accused is ready to submit his property details, bank account, mail credentials.
Union Bank Of India E Andhra Bank Vs Union Of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Considering the fact that the resolution plan has already been approved in this matter, and that the ED’s order of provisional attachment of the properties of Respondent No. 4 has been passed after the approval of the resolution plan […]
Vinod Kumar Vs State of U.P. ( Meerut District Court) The present bail application has been moved by accused Vinoad Kumar son of late Shri Ram Karan Garg resident of 49, Banarsi Dass Estate Timarpur, Delhi in case no. 73 of 2020 DGGI, Ghaziabad under Section 132(1)(b) 132 (1) (c) read with Section 132 (1) […]
Chahya Devi Vs State of U.P. (Meerut District Court) The present bail application has been moved by accused Mrs. Chahya Devi wife of Vijay Kumar Arya, proprietor M/S. Prabhat Zarda Factory (Oversease) R/0 J16 Sector 11] Noida 2012301 in case no. 167 of 2020 under Section 132(1)(a) 132 (1) (b) read with Section 132 (1) […]
