Green Orchard Farm Houses Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The Ld.AR has placed reliance on the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ACIT & anr. Vs. Hotel Blue Moon reported in (2010) 321 ITR 362 wherein Hon’ble Supreme Court held that an omission on part of the Assessing Officer u/s. 143(2) cannot be […]
Notification No. 69/2021-Customs (ADD), Dated: 13.12.2021 – Seeks to impose Anti-Dumping duty on the imports of Axle for Trailers in CKD/SKD form originating in or exported from the Peoples Republic of China. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) Notification No. 69/2021-Customs (ADD) New Delhi, the 13th December, 2021 G.S.R. 854(E). Whereas, in […]
Maharashtra Tax Practitioners’ Association has made an Appeal for extension of due date for furnishing of Income-tax returns, Tax audit reports etc. & also represented on Issues faced by us after launching of new website. MAHARASHTRA TAX PRACTITIONERS ASSOCIATION (Formerly known as The Western Maharashtra Tax Practitioners’ Association) “Dnyan Mandir”, Yadav Vyapar Bhavan, Shivaji Road, […]
In re Core Construction (Yatin Manoj Mora) (GST AAR Maharashtra) What Tax Rate to be charged by the sub-contractor to main contractor on Work Contract Services on Construction of Roads? In respect of Sub-Contract awarded to the applicant by M/s J. P. Enterprises (main contractor), to whom Aurangabad Municipal Corporation awarded the contract for Executing […]
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances when the petitioner was removed by the Bar Council under proviso to Section 26(1) of the Advocates Act and when the same is confirmed by the High Court it cannot be said that the High Court has committed any error.
In re Swastiks Masalas Pickles and Food Products Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Karnataka) i. What is the HSN Code of the product ‘Rava Idli Mix’? The product Rava Idli Mix merits classification under tariff heading 2106 and attracts 18% GST in terms of entry number 23 of schedule-III to the Notification No.01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated […]
The application is not admitted, under Section 98(2) read with Section 95(a) of CGST Act, 2017/UPGST Act, 2017 for the reason that the applicant has raised questions as a recipient of service
(Rent for locker provided in bus stand by the appellant) it is held to be an activity undertaken by the Municipality as a function entrusted under 243W of the Constitution and the service of rent or fee collection for such a facility is neither a Supply of Goods nor a supply of Service as per Notification No. 14/2017-CT (Rate).
The ambit of Advance Ruling do not provide for answering the questions raised on provisions relating to ‘Tax Collected at Source’ provided under Section 52 of the Act.
Tarakeswar Estate Vs Union of India & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) The petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order dated 20th March, 2021 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to assessment year 2018-2019, mainly on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice as well as total non-application of mind […]
