Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : P. Mohanasundaram Vs Bar Council of India & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13807/20199
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/12/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

P. Mohanasundaram Vs Bar Council of India & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)

We have heard Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. S.N. Bhat, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Bar Council of India.

Considering the fact that at the time when the petitioner submitted an application for enrolment as an Advocate, he suppressed the material fact of pending criminal case against him. It was also found that even he was continued as a partner in the Chartered Accountant Firm.

Cancellation of Enrolment of Advocate by BCI for suppressing Criminal Case against him during Enrolment justified SC

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances when the petitioner was removed by the Bar Council under proviso to Section 26(1) of the Advocates Act and when the same is confirmed by the High Court it cannot be said that the High Court has committed any error.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031